Academic Journal
Which single echo parameter is the best marker of left ventricular filling pressure?
| العنوان: | Which single echo parameter is the best marker of left ventricular filling pressure? |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Khan, F, Inoue, K, Remme, E.W, Andersen, O.S, Gude, E, Skulstad, H, Chetrit, M, Garcia-Izquierdo Jaen, E, Ha, J.W, Klein, A.L, Kikuchi, S, Ohte, N, Nagueh, S.F, Smiseth, O.A |
| المصدر: | European Heart Journal ; volume 41, issue Supplement_2 ; ISSN 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
| بيانات النشر: | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine |
| الوصف: | Background Estimation of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is highly relevant in clinical practice. Invasive pressure remains the gold standard, but a number of echocardiographic parameters that correlate with LVFP are used as non-invasive markers of pressure. Purpose We investigated how different echocardiographic parameters correlated with invasively measured LVFP, and how accurately those parameters could differentiate between normal or elevated LVFP. Method We performed a prospective, multicenter, multinational and multivendor study in an all comer population of 322 patients with suspected heart failure or other cardiovascular disease. 194 patients had EF ≥50% and 129 had EF <50%. LVFP was measured by right- or left heart catheterization, as pulmonary capillary wedge pressure or pre-A LV diastolic pressure, respectively. When excluding all special patient populations defined in the 2016 recommendations for echocardiographic evaluation of LV diastolic function, 213 patients remained. Of these 135 had EF ≥50% and 74 had EF <50%. Echocardiography was performed within 1 day of catheterization. Previously recommended cut-off values for established parameters were used to determine the accuracy of classifying LVFP as normal or elevated. For left atrial (LA) reservoir strain, based on ROC analysis, a cut-off value of <18% was used as marker of elevated LVFP. Results LA reservoir strain and the ratio of peak mitral early flow velocity (E) and LA reservoir strain (E/LA strain) showed the best correlations to LVFP (Table 1, Figure 1). They also had the highest accuracy, 75% for both, in classifying LVFP as normal or elevated in the whole patient population. E/LA reservoir strain provided no additional diagnostic value to using LA reservoir strain alone. In HFpEF patients accuracy was essentially similar for LA strain, E/LA strain and E/e', whereas in HFrEF patients the two former tended to be better than E/e'. Conclusion Parameters containing LA reservoir strain showed the best ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0050 |
| الاتاحة: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0050 http://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-pdf/41/Supplement_2/ehaa946.0050/34513828/ehaa946.0050.pdf |
| Rights: | https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.4C5554B5 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0050 |
|---|