Academic Journal
Perspectives of primary care physicians in Spain on malaria: a cross-sectional survey and retrospective review of cases
| العنوان: | Perspectives of primary care physicians in Spain on malaria: a cross-sectional survey and retrospective review of cases |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Linares-Rufo, Manuel, Bermudez-Marval, Harold, García-Bertolín, Carlos, Santos-Galilea, Joaquín, Balsa-Vázquez, Javier, Pérez-Tanoira, Ramón, Santos-Larrégola, Laura, Cuadros-González, Juan, Rojo-Marcos, Gerardo, Ramos-Rincón, José-Manuel |
| المصدر: | Malaria Journal ; volume 23, issue 1 ; ISSN 1475-2875 |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| الوصف: | Background In Spain, the risk of imported malaria has increased in recent years due to the rise in international travel and migration. Little is known about the knowledge, information sources, clinical practice, and specific needs of primary care physicians (PCPs) concerning malaria despite the pivotal role played by these professionals in managing the health of tourists. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of PCPs in Spain regarding malaria. Methods This research analyses data from (1) a cross-sectional nationwide survey assessing the knowledge and attitudes of PCPs regarding malaria, and (2) a retrospective review of 373 malaria cases appearing in primary care medical records (PCMRs) in the Madrid area over the past 15 years to determine how cases were documented, managed, or characterized in the primary care setting. Results The survey findings reveal a modest level of self-perceived familiarity with malaria (221/360, 57.6%), even though 32.8% of the practitioners reported having delivered care for confirmed or suspected cases of the disease, these practitioners had greater knowledge of malaria (80.4%) compared to physicians who reported not having delivered care for malaria (19.6%, p < 0.001). Ten percent of the survey participants did not know the name of the mosquito that transmits malaria, and only 40.7% would promptly request malaria testing for a traveller with symptoms after a trip to an endemic area. Responses provided by younger PCPs varied to a greater extent than those of their more experienced colleagues regarding prevention practices and patient management. A review of PCMRs showed that only 65% of all patients were recorded as such. Among those registered, only 40.3% had a documented malaria episode, and of those, only 16.6% received proper follow-up. Only 23.7% of the patients with a PCMR had a record that specifically indicated travel to an endemic country or travel classified as visiting friends and relatives (VFR). Conclusions The ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12936-023-04826-6 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12936-023-04826-6.pdf |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12936-023-04826-6/fulltext.html |
| الاتاحة: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04826-6 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12936-023-04826-6.pdf https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-023-04826-6/fulltext.html |
| Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.4AEB43A2 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12936-023-04826-6 |
|---|