التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
The comparison of lower extremity landing mechanics in current and previous female athletes following a foam rolling and dynamic warm-up. ; Landing mechanics in warm-ups ; Comparison of lower extremity landing mechanics in female athletes following a foam rolling and dynamic warm-up |
| المؤلفون: |
McCormick, Rachel E. |
| المساهمون: |
Dickin, Clark |
| سنة النشر: |
2020 |
| المجموعة: |
Ball State University: Cardinal Scholar |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
Jumping -- Physiological aspects, Leg -- Mechanical properties, Women college athletes -- Physiology, Stretching exercises |
| الوصف: |
Access to thesis restricted until 7/2023. ; Background: Dynamic warm-up is often considered the recommended warm-up technique in preparation for physical exertion, while foam rolling is traditionally used as a form of myofascial release recent studies have explored it as an alternative warm-up technique. While it is necessary to properly prepare the muscles for activity to aid in reduction of risk, the landing phase of a jump is one of the most impactful times on the lower body that a person endures throughout practice or game play and has been largely overlooked by previous research assessing foam rolling as a warm-up method. The purpose of this study was to compare a foam rolling warm-up procedure to a dynamic warm-up procedure in athletes involving maximum countermovement jumps. It was hypothesized that loading rate, vertical GRF, hip adduction and internal rotation, and knee abduction would decrease, while knee and hip flexion would be higher after foam rolling. Study Design: This is an experimental crossover study. Methods: Twelve female participants (19.33 ± 1.22 years; 1.65 ± 0.05 m; 66.04 ± 8.51 kg) performed maximal countermovement jumps prior to and post-warm-up interventions. All participants completed two collection days that randomly assigned the foam rolling warm-up and the dynamic warm-up as the intervention. Motion capture and force data were collected to calculate joint motion and loading during landing. Results: Significant differences were revealed for loading rate (p=0.041) when collapsed across time between foam rolling and the dynamic warmup. Interaction effects revealed significance for peak knee abduction angle (p=0.040). Several additional variables revealed small and medium effect sizes between both pre/post-warm-up and between warm-up interventions. Significance was also revealed for all ROM testing except sitand-reach after FR (p=0.165). Conclusion: Warm-up acceptability and superior benefits of one over the other cannot necessarily be made because of lack of significant data needed ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
other/unknown material |
| وصف الملف: |
application/pdf |
| اللغة: |
unknown |
| Relation: |
http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/20.500.14291/202431 |
| الاتاحة: |
http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/20.500.14291/202431
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14291/202431 |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.47188F53 |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |