Academic Journal
Comparison of bivalent and monovalent SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines: the phase 2 randomized open-label COVAIL trial
| العنوان: | Comparison of bivalent and monovalent SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines: the phase 2 randomized open-label COVAIL trial |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Branche, Angela R., Rouphael, Nadine G., Diemert, David J., Falsey, Ann R., Losada, Cecilia, Baden, Lindsey R., Frey, Sharon E., Whitaker, Jennifer A., Little, Susan J., Anderson, Evan J., Walter, Emmanuel B., Novak, Richard M., Rupp, Richard, Jackson, Lisa A., Babu, Tara M., Kottkamp, Angelica C., Luetkemeyer, Anne F., Immergluck, Lilly C., Presti, Rachel M., Bäcker, Martín, Winokur, Patricia L., Mahgoub, Siham M., Goepfert, Paul A., Fusco, Dahlene N., Malkin, Elissa, Bethony, Jeffrey M., Walsh, Edward E., Graciaa, Daniel S., Samaha, Hady, Sherman, Amy C., Walsh, Stephen R., Abate, Getahun, Oikonomopoulou, Zacharoula, El Sahly, Hana M., Martin, Thomas C. S., Kamidani, Satoshi, Smith, Michael J., Ladner, Benjamin G., Porterfield, Laura, Dunstan, Maya, Wald, Anna, Davis, Tamia, Atmar, Robert L., Mulligan, Mark J., Lyke, Kirsten E., Posavad, Christine M., Meagher, Megan A., Stephens, David S., Neuzil, Kathleen M., Abebe, Kuleni |
| المساهمون: | U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute |
| المصدر: | Nature Medicine ; volume 29, issue 9, page 2334-2346 ; ISSN 1078-8956 1546-170X |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| الوصف: | Vaccine protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection wanes over time, requiring updated boosters. In a phase 2, open-label, randomized clinical trial with sequentially enrolled stages at 22 US sites, we assessed safety and immunogenicity of a second boost with monovalent or bivalent variant vaccines from mRNA and protein-based platforms targeting wild-type, Beta, Delta and Omicron BA.1 spike antigens. The primary outcome was pseudovirus neutralization titers at 50% inhibitory dilution (ID 50 titers) with 95% confidence intervals against different SARS-CoV-2 strains. The secondary outcome assessed safety by solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, serious AEs and AEs of special interest. Boosting with prototype/wild-type vaccines produced numerically lower ID 50 titers than any variant-containing vaccine against all variants. Conversely, boosting with a variant vaccine excluding prototype was not associated with decreased neutralization against D614G. Omicron BA.1 or Beta monovalent vaccines were nearly equivalent to Omicron BA.1 + prototype or Beta + prototype bivalent vaccines for neutralization of Beta, Omicron BA.1 and Omicron BA.4/5, although they were lower for contemporaneous Omicron subvariants. Safety was similar across arms and stages and comparable to previous reports. Our study shows that updated vaccines targeting Beta or Omicron BA.1 provide broadly crossprotective neutralizing antibody responses against diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants without sacrificing immunity to the ancestral strain. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05289037 . |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41591-023-02503-4 |
| الاتاحة: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02503-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02503-4.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02503-4 |
| Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.41058629 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41591-023-02503-4 |
|---|