التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Table_1_Using the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework to assess the cooperative re-engagement controlled trial (CoRECT).DOCX |
| المؤلفون: |
Heather Elder, Simona G. Lang, Merceditas Villanueva, Betsey John, Kathleen Roosevelt, Frederick L. Altice, Kathleen A. Brady, Briana Gibson, Marianne Buchelli, Alfred DeMaria, Liisa M. Randall |
| سنة النشر: |
2023 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
Mental Health Nursing, Midwifery, Nursing not elsewhere classified, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health, Aged Health Care, Care for Disabled, Community Child Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Epidemiology, Family Care, Health and Community Services, Health Care Administration, Health Counselling, Health Information Systems (incl. Surveillance), Health Promotion, Preventive Medicine, Primary Health Care, Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, Nanotoxicology, Health and Safety, Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy, HIV, implementation science, out-of-care, re-engagement, RCT – randomized controlled trial, EPIS framework |
| الوصف: |
Background “Data to Care” (D2C) is a strategy which relies on a combination of public health surveillance data supplemented by clinic data to support continuity of HIV care. The Cooperative Re-Engagement Controlled Trial (CoRECT) was a CDC-sponsored randomized controlled trial of a D2C model, which provided an opportunity to examine the process of implementing an intervention for people with HIV (PWH) who are out-of-care across three public health department jurisdictions. Using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment) framework, we aimed to retrospectively describe the implementation process for each site to provide insights and guidance to inform future D2C activities implemented by public health agencies and their clinical and community partners. Methods After completion of CoRECT, the three (Connecticut, Massachusetts, Philadelphia) trial sites reviewed study protocols and held iterative discussions to describe and compare their processes regarding case identification, interactions with partnering clinics and patients, and sustainability. The EPIS framework provided a structure for comparing key organizational and operational practices and was applied to the entire implementation process. Results The trial sites varied in their implementation processes and the specific elements of the intervention. Factors including prior D2C experience, data management and analytic infrastructure, staff capacity, and relationships with clinic partners informed intervention development and implementation. Additionally, this review identified key lessons learned including to: (1) explore new supplemental sources for public health surveillance data; (2) work with stakeholders representing core functions/components in the early stages of the intervention design process; (3) build flexibility into all components of the follow-up activities; and (4) integrate data sharing, project management, and follow-up activities within existing DPH organizational structure. Conclusion The CoRECT study provides a ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
dataset |
| اللغة: |
unknown |
| Relation: |
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Using_the_exploration_preparation_implementation_sustainment_EPIS_framework_to_assess_the_cooperative_re-engagement_controlled_trial_CoRECT_DOCX/24712080 |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1223149.s001 |
| الاتاحة: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1223149.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Using_the_exploration_preparation_implementation_sustainment_EPIS_framework_to_assess_the_cooperative_re-engagement_controlled_trial_CoRECT_DOCX/24712080 |
| Rights: |
CC BY 4.0 |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.3E3FDE7F |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |