التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Clinical outcome measures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinician vs patient completed knee scores |
| المؤلفون: |
Al-Dadah O, Shepstone L, Donell ST |
| المصدر: |
The Surgeon, 2020 |
| بيانات النشر: |
Elsevier Ltd |
| سنة النشر: |
2020 |
| المجموعة: |
Newcastle University Library ePrints Service |
| الوصف: |
© 2020 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandIntroduction: Clinical outcome measures are important in both the conduct of clinical research and evaluation of knee surgery in every day clinical practice. A wide variety of validated outcome scores are available in the literature. The objective of this study was to investigate if there is a difference between clinician-completed and patient-completed outcome scores in detecting improvement following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Fifty patients with ACL rupture were prospectively evaluated using nine clinical outcome measures. Five clinician-completed knee scores included Tegner Activity Score, Lysholm Knee Score, Cincinnati Knee Score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Knee Score and Tapper and Hoover Meniscal Grading Score. Four patient-completed knee scores included IKDC Subjective Knee Score, Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Short Form-12 Item Health Survey (SF-12) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Thirty-four of the 50 patients underwent an ACL reconstruction and were reassessed with all nine outcome scores upon their follow-up review 3 months post-operatively. Results: A significant longitudinal improvement was observed of all five clinician-completed knee scores including Tegner (3.3–4.1 (p = 0.006)), Lysholm (71.7–85.3 (p < 0.001)), Cincinnati (62.6–75.9 (p < 0.001)), IKDC Objective (Abnormal to Nearly Normal (p = 0.001)) and Tapper and Hoover (Fair to Good (p < 0.001)). However, none of the four patient-completed knee scores revealed a statistically significant improvement post-operatively. Conclusions: Results of clinician-completed scores were found to be inconsistent with those of patient-completed instruments. It's important to consider the mode of administering outcome measures either for research or clinical practice as it can have a significant influence on ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: |
unknown |
| Relation: |
https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/271348 |
| الاتاحة: |
https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/271348 |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.3B17A67F |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |