Academic Journal
∗ The authors thank an anonymous referee, Sophie Bade, Ken Binmore, Steve Callander
العنوان: | ∗ The authors thank an anonymous referee, Sophie Bade, Ken Binmore, Steve Callander |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Marcus Berliant, Hideo Konishi, John Duggan, Matt Jackson, John Ledyard, Eric Rasmusen |
المساهمون: | The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
المصدر: | http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/WP603.pdf. |
سنة النشر: | 2004 |
المجموعة: | CiteSeerX |
الوصف: | Which issues are discussed by candidates in an election campaign? Why are some issues never discussed? Model tractability is lost quickly when dealing with these questions, partly because of the multidimensional voting inherent in models of multiple issues. Our model features two candidates for office who can talk about any subset of issues, allowing uncertainty both on the part of voters and candidates, and taking candidates to be office motivated. Candidates move first and simultaneously, announcing any positions they choose on any issues. To us, salience is simply the discussion of an issue in a campaign. If both candidates and voters are expected utility maximizers, we find salience results, in that candidates typically want to talk about everything (or they are indifferent between talking and nonsalience). Leaving the expected utility framework, we present an example using “Knightian un- |
نوع الوثيقة: | text |
وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
اللغة: | English |
Relation: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.92.5112; http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/WP603.pdf |
الاتاحة: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.92.5112 http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/WP603.pdf |
Rights: | Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.37D6FD40 |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
الوصف غير متاح. |