التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Data_Sheet_1_Exploring metaphor's communicative effects in reasoning on vaccination.docx |
| المؤلفون: |
Francesca Ervas, Pietro Salis, Cristina Sechi, Rachele Fanari |
| سنة النشر: |
2022 |
| المجموعة: |
Frontiers: Figshare |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Neuroscience and Physiological Psychology, Organizational Behavioral Psychology, Personality, Social and Criminal Psychology, Gender Psychology, Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology, Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Psychology not elsewhere classified, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified, uncertain reasoning, metaphor, collective immunity, trust, vaccine communication, defeasible reasoning, vaccination |
| الوصف: |
Introduction The paper investigates the impact of the use of metaphors in reasoning tasks concerning vaccination, especially for defeasible reasoning cases. We assumed that both metaphor and defeasible reasoning can be relevant to let people understand vaccination as an important collective health phenomenon, by anticipating possible defeating conditions. Methods We hypothesized that extended metaphor could improve both the argumentative and the communicative effects of the message. We designed an empirical study to test our main hypotheses: participants (N = 196, 78% females; Meanage = 27.97 years, SDage = 10.40) were presented with a text about vaccination, described in either literal or metaphorical terms, based on uncertain vs. safe reasoning scenarios. Results The results of the study confirmed that defeasible reasoning is relevant for the communicative impact of a text and that an extended metaphor enhances the overall communicative effects of the message, in terms of understandability, persuasion, perceived safety, and feeling of control over the health situation, collective trust in expertise and uptake of experts' advice. However, the results show that this effect is significantly nuanced by the type of defeasible reasoning, especially in the case of participants' trust in expertise and commitment to experts' advice. Conclusion Both communicative and defeasible reasoning competences are needed to enhance trust in immunization, with possible different outcomes at an individual and collective level. |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
dataset |
| اللغة: |
unknown |
| Relation: |
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Exploring_metaphor_s_communicative_effects_in_reasoning_on_vaccination_docx/21580752 |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027733.s001 |
| الاتاحة: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027733.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Exploring_metaphor_s_communicative_effects_in_reasoning_on_vaccination_docx/21580752 |
| Rights: |
CC BY 4.0 |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.28C9485D |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |