Academic Journal

Pros and Cons of Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Pros and Cons of Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery
المؤلفون: Beckmann, Jan Henrik, Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie, Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas, von Schönfels, Witigo, Taivankhuu, Terbish, Laudes, Matthias, Egberts, Jan-Hendrik, Becker, Thomas
المصدر: Visceral Medicine ; volume 36, issue 3, page 238-245 ; ISSN 2297-4725 2297-475X
بيانات النشر: S. Karger AG
سنة النشر: 2020
الوصف: Introduction: Revisional procedures in bariatric surgery are regarded as technically more demanding and riskier than primary interventions. While the use of the surgical robot has not yet proven to be advantageous in primary bariatric interventions, the question remains whether its use is justified for more complex revisional procedures. Objective: To show that revisional bariatric surgery can be performed safely using the da Vinci® Xi surgical system. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data for revisional bariatric procedures between January 2016 and November 2019. Results: Of 78 revision operations, four (5.1%) were performed by open surgery, 30 (38.5%) by laparoscopic surgery, and 44 (56.4%) by robotic surgery. A comparative analysis of robotic (n = 41) versus laparoscopic (n = 18) revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (rRYGB) revealed significant differences favoring the robotic approach for operative time (130.7 vs. 167.6 min), C-reactive protein values at days 1 (27.9 vs. 49.1 mg/L) and 2 (48.2 vs. 83.6 mg/L) after surgery, and length of stay (4.9 vs. 6.2 days). Lower complication rates (Clavien-Dindo II–V) were found after rRRYGB (7.3 vs. 22.2%, not significant). Conclusions: Revisional bariatric surgery using a robotic system is safe. The operative time performing rRRYGB is significantly shorter than rLRYGB in our experience. Otherwise, results were largely comparable. Due to different indications, different index operations and a wide range of revisional procedures, further studies are necessary to confirm these results.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1159/000507742
الاتاحة: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000507742
https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/507742
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.233862CA
قاعدة البيانات: BASE