What does geohistory contribute to the debate on the degree of anthropization of the Amazon rainforest?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: What does geohistory contribute to the debate on the degree of anthropization of the Amazon rainforest?
المؤلفون: Todorov, Nicola Peter
المساهمون: Centre d'histoire du XIXe siècle (CRHXIX), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Université de Guyane (UG), UGI
المصدر: Time for geographers Le temps des géographes Le congrès du centenaire ; https://hal.science/hal-04367300 ; Time for geographers Le temps des géographes Le congrès du centenaire, UGI, Jul 2022, Paris, France ; https://www.ugiparis2022.org/fr/informationscientifique/1
بيانات النشر: HAL CCSD
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne: HAL
مصطلحات موضوعية: "historical geography", "Amazonian rainforest", "demographics", "historical sources", "spatial differentiation", [SHS.GEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, [SHS.HIST]Humanities and Social Sciences/History
جغرافية الموضوع: Paris, France
الوصف: International audience ; For several decades, the idea of a virgin Amazon rainforest has been questioned by anthropologists, archaeologists, and geographers (Clement, 2015). The presence of soils of anthropogenic origin and the accounts of the first Europeans of dense populations led these researchers to propose much higher population estimates and to postulate the existence of complex societies before the demographic collapse produced by Old World diseases at the first contacts around 1500. Some have gone so far as to postulate that the space of the present dense and evergreen forest was open parkland. In addition, the concentration of certain useful species near archaeological sites has prompted the postulate that pre-Columbian societies have profoundly modified the floristic composition of the forest. It is considered to consist of manufactured landscapes. These theses continue to be bitterly contested by research teams of paleoecologists, climatologists, and botanists (Barlow et alii, 2012).Addressing this problem as a historical geographer involves both a geographer's work on historical sources, but also the mobilization of conceptual contributions from geohistory. As for the approaches of the first written sources of the 16th century for the reconstitution of the population, the transformation of the environment by pre-Columbian societies, the physiognomy of plant formations, they are not very concerned with the study of the spatial differentiation of the Amazon rainforest, and this is only partially due to the difficulty of localizing accurately the observations of the first explorers (Rostain, 2017). The idea of a heavily populated Amazon rainforest also contradicts certain achievements of geohistory, making densification over large areas a function of the long duration, the antiquity of the population, despite phases of demographic decline (Grataloup, 2007). This paper aims to examine what a geohistorical approach can can contribute to this debate.
نوع الوثيقة: conference object
اللغة: English
Relation: hal-04367300; https://hal.science/hal-04367300
الاتاحة: https://hal.science/hal-04367300
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.21BD7E49
قاعدة البيانات: BASE