Academic Journal
Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist
| العنوان: | Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Tomacheuski, Rubia Mitalli, Monteiro, Beatriz Paglerani, Evangelista, Marina Cayetano, Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro, Steagall, Paulo Vinícius |
| المساهمون: | Montazeri, Ali, FAPESP, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada |
| المصدر: | PLOS ONE ; volume 18, issue 1, page e0280830 ; ISSN 1932-6203 |
| بيانات النشر: | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | PLOS Publications (via CrossRef) |
| الوصف: | This systematic review aimed to investigate the measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals. According to the PRISMA guidelines, a registered report protocol was previously published in this journal. Studies reporting the development and validation of acute and chronic pain scoring instruments based on behavioral and/or facial expressions of farm animals were searched. Data extraction and assessment were performed individually by two investigators using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Nine categories were assessed: two for scale development (general design requirements and development, and content validity and comprehensibility) and seven for measurement properties (internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, criterion and construct validity, responsiveness and cross-cultural validity). The overall strength of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) of each instrument was scored based on methodological quality, number of studies and studies’ findings. Twenty instruments for three species (bovine, ovine and swine) were included. There was considerable variability concerning their development and measurement properties. Three behavior-based instruments scored high for strength of evidence: UCAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Unidimensional Composite Pain Scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle), USAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Sheep Acute Composite Pain Scale) and UPAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale). Four instruments scored moderate for strength of evidence: MPSS (Multidimensional Pain Scoring System for bovine), SPFES (Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale), LGS (Lamb Grimace Scale) and PGS-B (Piglet Grimace Scale-B). Most instruments (n = 13) scored low or very low for final overall evidence. Construct validity was the most reported measurement property followed by criterion validity and reliability. Instruments with reported validation are urgently required for pain assessment of buffalos, goats, camelids ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0280830 |
| الاتاحة: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280830 https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280830 |
| Rights: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.1A9EFF95 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0280830 |
|---|