A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy
المؤلفون: Angelo Zullo, Stefano Pontone, A. Bellumat, Cesare Hassan, Flavio Valiante, Manuela De Bona, Michele De Boni, Vincenzo De Francesco
المصدر: Digestive and Liver Disease. 44:224-227
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2012.
سنة النشر: 2012
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Settore MED/12 - GASTROENTEROLOGIA, Cathartic, Colonoscopy, Ascorbic Acid, Polyethylene glycol, Gastroenterology, Polyethylene Glycols, law.invention, chemistry.chemical_compound, Randomized controlled trial, law, Internal medicine, PEG ratio, medicine, Humans, Single-Blind Method, Bowel cleansing, Aged, Intention-to-treat analysis, Hepatology, medicine.diagnostic_test, Cathartics, business.industry, technology, industry, and agriculture, Vitamins, Middle Aged, Ascorbic acid, Intention to Treat Analysis, Surgery, chemistry, Patient Compliance, Female, business
الوصف: Background Bowel preparation is critical for the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy. Poor patient tolerance to bowel preparation has been associated with the high amount of fluid administered. A 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution containing ascorbic acid has been recently developed. Aims To compare the efficacy, safety and acceptability of 2-L PEG + ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG for colonoscopy. Methods We designed a single blind randomized non-inferiority study in order to compare the two bowel preparations. A blinded assessment of cleansing was made by the endoscopist according to the Aronchick scale. Acceptability was assessed by questionnaire. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis were reported. Results Overall, 169 patients (PP: 166) were selected for the 2-L PEG + ascorbic acid and 170 (PP: 166) for the 4-L PEG. When rating global bowel cleansing at ITT, an excellent-good level was reported in 84.6% (PP: 86.2%) of patients who received 2-L PEG + ascorbic acid and 75.3% (PP: 77%) of patients who received 4-L PEG (p = 0.04). Acceptability rate favoured 2-L PEG + ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG (83% vs 76%; p = 0.02). Conclusions 2-L PEG + ascorbic acid, completed with an additional L of clear fluids, provided bowel cleansing which appeared to be more effective and acceptable than 4-L PEG.
تدمد: 1590-8658
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.007
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::f50a9fa6b974be88c95632878ddf342f
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.007
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....f50a9fa6b974be88c95632878ddf342f
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:15908658
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.007