التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK |
| المؤلفون: |
Louise Heathwaite, Keith Beven, Joseph Holden, Enda O'Connell, Anna Murgatroyd, Robert L. Wilby, Paul D. Bates, Nick Reynard, Simon Dadson, Jim W. Hall, Stuart N. Lane, Mike Acreman, David Sear, Ian P. Holman, Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell, Colin R. Thorne |
| المصدر: |
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science, vol. 473, pp. 20160706
Proceedings. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences |
| بيانات النشر: |
Royal Society, 2017. |
| سنة النشر: |
2017 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
flood risk management, 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences, Operations research, Science Policy, General Mathematics, 0208 environmental biotechnology, Drainage basin, General Physics and Astronomy, hydrology, Review Article, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, Natural hazard, Natural science, General Engineering, Environmental planning, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences, Annotated bibliography, geography.geographical_feature_category, Flood myth, Targeted interventions, 020801 environmental engineering, science policy, Geography, Natural processes, natural flood management, Science policy, Hydrology |
| الوصف: |
Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material. |
| وصف الملف: |
text; application/pdf |
| اللغة: |
English |
| تدمد: |
1364-5021 |
| DOI: |
10.1098/rspa.2016.0706 |
| URL الوصول: |
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c751e69977eb9041e3d44058b5b31385 |
| Rights: |
OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsair.doi.dedup.....c751e69977eb9041e3d44058b5b31385 |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
OpenAIRE |