Lipoprotein apheresis influences monocyte subpopulations

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Lipoprotein apheresis influences monocyte subpopulations
المؤلفون: Stefan R. Bornstein, Karim Ibrahim, Ulrike Schatz, Christian Pfluecke, Ulrich Julius, Ruth H. Strasser, David M. Poitz, Antje Schauer, C. Reich, Sergey Tselmin, Stefanie Jellinghaus, Bernd Hohenstein
المساهمون: University of Zurich, Poitz, D M
سنة النشر: 2017
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, Male, Time Factors, Lipopolysaccharide Receptors, 10265 Clinic for Endocrinology and Diabetology, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Monocytes, Coronary artery disease, Hospitals, University, 0302 clinical medicine, Germany, Myocardial infarction, Aged, 80 and over, education.field_of_study, biology, General Medicine, Lipoprotein(a), Middle Aged, Lipids, medicine.anatomical_structure, Phenotype, Treatment Outcome, Blood Component Removal, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Lipoprotein apheresis, Adult, CD14, Population, 610 Medicine & health, CD16, GPI-Linked Proteins, 2705 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Andrology, 03 medical and health sciences, Internal Medicine, medicine, Humans, education, Aged, Dyslipidemias, business.industry, Monocyte, Receptors, IgG, medicine.disease, 030104 developmental biology, 2724 Internal Medicine, Case-Control Studies, Immunology, biology.protein, business, Biomarkers
الوصف: Background Monocytes can be differentiated into subpopulations depending on their expression profile of CD14 and CD16. CD16-positive monocytes are associated with coronary artery disease. Up to now, no data exist about the effect of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on the distribution of monocyte subpopulations. Methods 80 patients who underwent LA at the University Hospital Dresden were included in the study. 8 out of the 80 LA patients received LA for the first time at the time point of blood analysis. Six different methods of LA were used (H.E.L.P. n = 8; Liposorber D n = 10; LF n = 14; DALI n = 17; MONET n = 11; Therasorb ® LDL n = 12). Blood samples were taken immediately before and after LA and analyzed for CD14 and CD16 expression on monocytes. A total of 42 patients with cardiovascular risk factors but no indication for LA served as control group. Results The composition of monocyte-population was analyzed in regard to the 3 subpopulations. After LA, an increase in classical monocytes (CD14 ++ CD16 − ) (93.3% vs. 93.9%, p + CD16 + ) (1.5% vs 1.0%; p ++ CD16 + ) (5.3% vs. 5.1%). Two methods (MONET and Therasorb ® LDL) did not influence the distribution of monocyte subpopulations. Interestingly, patients with LDL-C above 2.5 mmol/l prior LA showed increased amounts of intermediate monocytes. Conclusion The distribution of monocyte populations is influenced by LA but depends on the distinct method of LA. Influences of LA were mainly observed in the content of classical and non-classical monocytes, whereas the intermediate monocyte population remained unaltered by LA.
اللغة: English
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c1166e76b1c1446969fcdff4f1adf5d8
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/149267/
Rights: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....c1166e76b1c1446969fcdff4f1adf5d8
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE