Clinical Decision-Making in Community Children’s Mental Health: Using Innovative Methods to Compare Clinicians With and Without Training in Evidence-Based Treatment
| العنوان: | Clinical Decision-Making in Community Children’s Mental Health: Using Innovative Methods to Compare Clinicians With and Without Training in Evidence-Based Treatment |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Ann F. Garland, Mary J. Baker-Ericzén, Melissa M. Jenkins, Soojin Park |
| المصدر: | Child & Youth Care Forum. 44:133-157 |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2014. |
| سنة النشر: | 2014 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Evidence-based practice, business.industry, Context effect, Teaching method, Professional development, Coding (therapy), Protocol analysis, Mental health, Article, Clinical decision making, Nursing, Medicine, Life-span and Life-course Studies, business, Social Sciences (miscellaneous) |
| الوصف: | Mental health professionals' decision-making practice is an area of increasing interest and importance, especially in the pediatric research and clinical communities.The present study explored the role of prior training in evidence-based treatments on clinicians' assessment and treatment formulations using case vignettes. Specifically, study aims included using the Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) cognitive theory to 1) examine potential associations between EBT training and decision-making processes (novice versus expert type), and 2) explore how client and family contextual information affects clinical decision-making.Forty-eight clinicians across two groups (EBT trained=14, Not EBT trained=34) participated. Clinicians were comparable on professional experience, demographics, and discipline. The quasi-experimental design used an analog "think aloud" method where clinicians read case vignettes about a child with disruptive behavior problems and verbalized case conceptualization and treatment planning out-loud. Responses were coded according to NDM theory.MANOVA results were significant for EBT training status such that EBT trained clinicians' displayed cognitive processes more closely aligned with "expert" decision-makers and non-EBT trained clinicians' decision processes were more similar to "novice" decision-makers, following NDM theory. Non-EBT trained clinicians assigned significantly more diagnoses, provided less detailed treatment plans and discussed fewer EBTs. Parent/family contextual information also appeared to influence decision-making.This study offers a preliminary investigation of the possible broader impacts of EBT training and potential associations with development of expert decision-making skills. Targeting clinicians' decision-making may be an important avenue to pursue within dissemination-implementation efforts in mental health practice. |
| تدمد: | 1573-3319 1053-1890 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10566-014-9274-x |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::b8e7327a2837e43e776257c2add3166c https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-014-9274-x |
| Rights: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....b8e7327a2837e43e776257c2add3166c |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15733319 10531890 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10566-014-9274-x |