Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Overestimates Fat-Free Mass in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Overestimates Fat-Free Mass in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment
المؤلفون: Amanda G. Pfeiffer, Caryl Russell, Carrie P. Earthman, Schuyler Schmidt, Marina Mourtzakis, Kirsten E. Bell, Lisa Bos
المصدر: Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral NutritionReferences. 35(6)
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, 030309 nutrition & dietetics, Population, Medicine (miscellaneous), Breast Neoplasms, Overweight, Body Mass Index, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Breast cancer, Absorptiometry, Photon, Fat free mass, Electric Impedance, Medicine, Humans, education, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, 2. Zero hunger, 0303 health sciences, education.field_of_study, Nutrition and Dietetics, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Reproducibility of Results, medicine.disease, Obesity, Body Composition, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, Female, medicine.symptom, business, Nuclear medicine, human activities, Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Body mass index
الوصف: Background Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is commonly used to assess fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) in breast cancer patients. However, because of the prevalence of overweight, obesity and variable hydration status in these patients, assumptions for existing prediction equations developed in healthy adults may be violated, resulting in inaccurate body composition assessment. Methods We measured whole-body FFM using single-frequency BIA (50 kHz) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 48 patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. We applied raw BIA data to 18 previously published FFM prediction equations (FFMBIA ) and compared these estimates to DXA (FFMDXA ; reference method). Results On average, patients were 52 ± 10 (mean ± SD) years of age and overweight (body mass index: 27.5 ± 5.5 kg/m2 ; body fat by DXA: 40.1% ± 6.6%). Relative to DXA, BIA overestimated FFM by 4.1 ± 3.4 kg (FFMDXA : 42.0 ± 5.9 kg; FFMBIA : 46.1 ± 3.4 kg). Individual equation-generated predictions of FFMBIA ranged from 39.6 ± 6.7 to 52.2 ± 5.6 kg, with 16 equations overestimating and 2 equations underestimating FFMBIA compared with FFMDXA . Based on equivalence testing, no equation-generated estimates were equivalent to DXA. Conclusion Compared with DXA, BIA overestimated FFM in breast cancer patients during treatment. Although several equations performed better than others, none produced values that aligned closely with DXA. Caution should be used when interpreting BIA measurements in this clinical population, and future studies should develop prediction equations specific to breast cancer patients.
تدمد: 1941-2452
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::b08b5e7258064c9d7b42c318099b80ec
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31769074
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....b08b5e7258064c9d7b42c318099b80ec
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE