Using weighted power mean for equivalent square estimation

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Using weighted power mean for equivalent square estimation
المؤلفون: Megan Hyun, Sicong Li, Qiyong Fan, R Ma, Dandan Zheng, Tyler Diener, Qiuwen Wu, Shuo Wang, Mutian Zhang, Sumin Zhou, Charles A. Enke, Xiaobo Li, Y Lei
المصدر: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
سنة النشر: 2017
مصطلحات موضوعية: equivalent square, Residual, Standard deviation, Square (algebra), 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Approximation error, Neoplasms, Statistics, Akaike Information Criterion, Applied mathematics, Humans, Radiation Oncology Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, weighted power mean, Instrumentation, Mathematics, linac output factors, Photons, Radiation, Data Collection, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Truebeam, Radiotherapy Dosage, Function (mathematics), 87.55.ne, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, CM-field, Akaike information criterion, Particle Accelerators, Radiology
الوصف: Purpose Equivalent Square (ES) enables the calculation of many radiation quantities for rectangular treatment fields, based only on measurements from square fields. While it is widely applied in radiotherapy, its accuracy, especially for extremely elongated fields, still leaves room for improvement. In this study, we introduce a novel explicit ES formula based on Weighted Power Mean (WPM) function and compare its performance with the Sterling formula and Vadash/Bjarngard's formula. Methods The proposed WPM formula is ESWPMa,b=waα+1−wbα1/α for a rectangular photon field with sides a and b. The formula performance was evaluated by three methods: standard deviation of model fitting residual error, maximum relative model prediction error, and model's Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Testing datasets included the ES table from British Journal of Radiology (BJR), photon output factors (Scp) from the Varian TrueBeam Representative Beam Data (Med Phys. 2012;39:6981–7018), and published Scp data for Varian TrueBeam Edge (J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16:125-148). Results For the BJR dataset, the best-fit parameter value α = −1.25 achieved a 20% reduction in standard deviation in ES estimation residual error compared with the two established formulae. For the two Varian datasets, employing WPM reduced the maximum relative error from 3.5% (Sterling) or 2% (Vadash/Bjarngard) to 0.7% for open field sizes ranging from 3 cm to 40 cm, and the reduction was even more prominent for 1 cm field sizes on Edge (J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16:125–148). The AIC value of the WPM formula was consistently lower than its counterparts from the traditional formulae on photon output factors, most prominent on very elongated small fields. Conclusion The WPM formula outperformed the traditional formulae on three testing datasets. With increasing utilization of very elongated, small rectangular fields in modern radiotherapy, improved photon output factor estimation is expected by adopting the WPM formula in treatment planning and secondary MU check.
تدمد: 1526-9914
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::966bafd319b8bee5fff9db5bc108b7ff
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29087037
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....966bafd319b8bee5fff9db5bc108b7ff
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE