A highly sensitive and selective high pressure liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) method for the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA)

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A highly sensitive and selective high pressure liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) method for the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA)
المؤلفون: Fagen Zhang, Tim Erskine, Raja S. Settivari, Sue Marty, Joanna Klapacz
المصدر: Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. 94(Pt 2)
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, Peptide, 010501 environmental sciences, Toxicology, Mass spectrometry, Tandem mass spectrometry, 01 natural sciences, High-performance liquid chromatography, 03 medical and health sciences, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Reactivity (chemistry), Cysteine, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences, Pharmacology, chemistry.chemical_classification, Chromatography, Chemistry, Lysine, Highly sensitive, Dermal sensitization, 030104 developmental biology, Hplc ms ms, Calibration, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Peptides
الوصف: While the HPLC/UV (high performance liquid chromatography coupled with ultra-violet spectrometry)-based DPRA (Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay) identifies dermal sensitizers with approximately 80% accuracy, the low selectivity and sensitivity of the HPLC/UV-based DPRA poses challenges to accurately identify the sensitization potential of certain chemicals. In this study, a high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS)-based DPRA was developed and validated according to the test guideline (OECD TG 442C). The final results were compared with the results from the traditional HPLC/UV-based guideline DPRA. This HPLC/MS-MS-based DPRA demonstrated similar performance compared to HPLC/UV-based DPRA using known dermal sensitizers and non-sensitizers according to the test guideline (OECD TG 442C). Following the validation, a challenge set of chemicals with either overlapping retention time with peptides, or higher hydrophobicity or chemicals potentially forming non-covalent interactions with peptides were assessed for dermal sensitization potential using both methods and the results were compared to existing in vivo data. The HPLC/MS-MS-based DPRA correctly predicted these chemicals as sensitizers or non-sensitizers; however, the HPLC/UV-based DPRA resulted in false-positive predictions for hydrophobic substances, chemicals with UV peaks overlapping with those of the peptide(s), and compounds that non-covalently interact with the peptides. These findings demonstrate the broader applicability and better sensitivity and selectivity of the LC/MS-MS-based DPRA over the traditional HPLC/UV-based guideline DPRA.
تدمد: 1873-488X
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::8af2eb068427a6422d14c9328b583d0e
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30099091
Rights: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....8af2eb068427a6422d14c9328b583d0e
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE