Psychotherapists, researchers, or both? A qualitative analysis of psychotherapists' experiences in a practice research network
| العنوان: | Psychotherapists, researchers, or both? A qualitative analysis of psychotherapists' experiences in a practice research network |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Stephen A. Ragusea, Catherine Spayd, Jeffrey S. Jackson, Diana D. Damer, Dana L. Nelson, Mary A. Boutselis, Tara Weiszer, Neal A. Hemmelstein, Nancy R. Chiswick, J. Gowen Roper, Thomas D. Borkovec, Louis G. Castonguay, Marolyn Morford |
| المصدر: | Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 47:345-354 |
| بيانات النشر: | American Psychological Association (APA), 2010. |
| سنة النشر: | 2010 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Male, Protocol (science), Medical education, Psychotherapist, Health Personnel, media_common.quotation_subject, Professional-Patient Relations, Research Personnel, Practice research, Interviews as Topic, Psychotherapy, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Health personnel, Qualitative analysis, Feeling, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Routine clinical practice, Cooperative behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Psychology, Qualitative research, media_common |
| الوصف: | This paper describes the experiences of psychotherapists who, as part of a practice research network (PRN), collaborated with researchers in designing and conducting a psychotherapy study within their own clinical practices. A qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with these psychotherapists led to the delineation of several benefits (e.g., learning information that improved their work with clients and feeling that they were contributing to research that would be useful for psychotherapists) and difficulties for them and their clients (e.g., time and effort required to integrate research protocol into routine clinical practice) that psychotherapists associated with their participation in the PRN. Also identified were a number of strategies used by psychotherapists to address obstacles that they encountered, as well as general recommendations for future PRN studies. As a whole, the experiences of these psychotherapists are likely to provide valuable lessons for the survival and growth of what is viewed by many as a promising pathway for building a stronger bridge between practice and research. |
| تدمد: | 1939-1536 0033-3204 |
| DOI: | 10.1037/a0021165 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6c99317037f6953ec2fd2f807271a99e https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021165 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....6c99317037f6953ec2fd2f807271a99e |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 19391536 00333204 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1037/a0021165 |