Managing highly sensitized renal transplant candidates in the era of kidney paired donation and the new kidney allocation system: Is there still a role for desensitization?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Managing highly sensitized renal transplant candidates in the era of kidney paired donation and the new kidney allocation system: Is there still a role for desensitization?
المؤلفون: Stanley C. Jordan, Hasan Khamash, Carrie A. Schinstock, Andrew Bentall, Robert A. Montgomery, Martin L. Mai, Byron H. Smith, Mark D. Stegall
المصدر: Clinical transplantationREFERENCES. 33(12)
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Waiting time, Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Kidney Paired Donation, medicine.medical_treatment, 030230 surgery, Donor Selection, Resource Allocation, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Highly sensitized, HLA Antigens, Internal medicine, medicine, Living Donors, Humans, Desensitization (medicine), Retrospective Studies, Transplantation, business.industry, Histocompatibility Testing, Middle Aged, Kidney Transplantation, Transplant Recipients, United States, Kidney allocation, Renal transplant, Desensitization, Immunologic, Cohort, Kidney Failure, Chronic, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, Female, business, Follow-Up Studies
الوصف: Kidney paired donation (KPD) and the new kidney allocation system (KAS) in the United States have led to improved transplantation rates for highly sensitized candidates. We aimed to assess the potential need for other approaches to improve the transplantation rate of highly sensitized candidates such as desensitization. Using the UNOS STAR file, we analyzed transplant rates in a prevalent active waiting-list cohort as of June 1, 2016, followed for 1 year. The overall transplantation rate was 18.9% (11 129/58769). However, only 9.7% (213/2204) of candidates with a calculated panel reactive antibody ≥99.9% received a transplant, and highly sensitized candidates were less likely to receive a living donor transplant. Among candidates with a CPRA ≥ 99.5% (ie. 100%), only 2.5% of transplants were from living donors (13 total, 7 from KPD). Nearly 4 years after KAS (6/30/2018), 1791 actively wait-listed candidates had a CPRA of ≥99.9% and 34.6% (620/1791) of these had ≥5 years of waiting time. Thus, despite KPD and KAS, many sensitized candidates have not been transplanted even with prolonged waiting time. We conclude that candidates with a CPRA ≥ 99.9% and sensitized candidates with an incompatible living donor and prolonged waiting time may benefit from desensitization to improve their ability to receive a transplant.
تدمد: 1399-0012
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::62f2468357d09a4b1efac0c8438e3d16
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31769104
Rights: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....62f2468357d09a4b1efac0c8438e3d16
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE