Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis for preventing infectious complications after transurethral resection of the bladder: to use or not to use?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis for preventing infectious complications after transurethral resection of the bladder: to use or not to use?
المؤلفون: E. Verzotti, Giovanni Liguori, T. Tony Cai, Michele Rizzo, Andrea Cocci, Giacomo Di Cosmo, Paolo Umari, Nicola Pavan, Carlo Trombetta, Gernot Bonkat
المساهمون: Rizzo, Michele, Verzotti, Enrica, Di Cosmo, Giacomo, Cai, Tommaso, Pavan, Nicola, Bonkat, Gernot, Umari, Paolo, Cocci, Andrea, Trombetta, Carlo, Liguori, Giovanni
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, transurethral resection of bladder cancer, Urology, Urinary Bladder, 030232 urology & nephrology, Sepsis, 03 medical and health sciences, Postoperative Complications, 0302 clinical medicine, infectious complications, infectious complication, Anti-Infective Agents, Interquartile range, Prevalence, medicine, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Antimicrobial stewardship, perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, bladder cancer, antimicrobial stewardship, antimicrobial resistance, Perioperative Period, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, Bladder cancer, business.industry, Septic shock, Incidence (epidemiology), perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxi, Perioperative, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Antimicrobial, Surgery, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Female, business
الوصف: Purpose: Transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) is a common endoscopic procedure. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is used to reduce the risk of infectious complications. However, there is an absence of knowledge about both incidence of infectious complications after TURB and advantage of AMP in general. The objective of this study is to determinate the prevalence of postoperative infectious complications after routine TURB without AMP. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of all patients who underwent TURB in the same Academic Urologic Department between January 2011 and December 2013. We consider as relevant for analysis, patients that underwent TURB without receiving any AMP. Infection was defined as a body temperature >37.5°C sustained for at least 24 hours. Sepsis was defined according to the third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock. Results: In the period of the study, 223 TURBs were performed without use of AMP. Mean age was 70.3 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.3). Mean operative time was 25.14 minutes (SD 16). Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-4). Six (2.7%) patients developed postoperative infective complications. No case of sepsis was reported. Two (0.9%) patients received an antimicrobial therapy with fluoroquinolones despite absence of any signs of infection. Two hundred fifteen (96.4%) patients of TURBs did not receive any antimicrobial drugs and did not develop any infectious complications. Conclusion: In our series, infectious complications after TURB occurred in
وصف الملف: ELETTRONICO
اللغة: English
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::524f829cad0a77d6ecdf07b4694a8cd4
https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2954835
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....524f829cad0a77d6ecdf07b4694a8cd4
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE