Once Daily Versus Twice Daily External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Prospective Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Once Daily Versus Twice Daily External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Prospective Study
المؤلفون: Ayman Gaber, Ahmed Farahat, Tarek Hashem, Rimoun Boutrus, Medhat El Sebaie, Mohammed Bayomy, Sara El Sherif, Yasser Abdelazim
المصدر: International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 109:1296-1300
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Organs at Risk, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Time Factors, Pulmonary toxicity, Urology, Breast Neoplasms, Mastectomy, Segmental, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Breast cancer, medicine, Humans, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Prospective Studies, Radiation Injuries, Prospective cohort study, Subcutaneous fibrosis, Pain Measurement, Radiation, Radiotherapy, business.industry, Dose fractionation, Partial Breast Irradiation, Cosmesis, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Tumor Burden, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Oncology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Toxicity, Female, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, business
الوصف: Purpose The aim of the current study was to compare toxicity, cosmesis, and local control between the once daily and the twice daily fractionation schemes for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation. Methods and Materials From December 2012 to June 2018, we enrolled 113 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, node negative disease, and tumors less than 3 cm in size to receive accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) to a total dose of 38.5 Gy over 10 fractions given either once (oAPBI) or twice daily (tAPBI). Sixty patients were included in the tAPBI arm and 53 patients were included in the oAPBI arm. Results Median follow-up was 74 months (range, 24-105). The median pain score during treatment was 3 out of 10 in the oAPBI and 5 in the tAPBI (P = .001). No differences were observed in GIII early skin toxicity (P = .4) or GI early pulmonary toxicity (P = 1.0) between the 2 treatment arms. GIII late skin toxicity developed in 3.8% and 11.7% of patients in the oAPBI and tAPBI arms, respectively (P = .001). GIII subcutaneous fibrosis developed in 1.9% and 8.3% of patients in the oAPBI and tAPBI, respectively (P = .001). The rate of patients with adverse cosmesis (poor/fair) was 7.5% at 12 months and at 24 months in the oAPBI arm compared with 21.7% and 26.7% in the tAPBI arm (P = .03 and .008, respectively). Conclusions oAPBI is a safe, well-tolerated schedule with more favorable outcomes than the tAPBI schedule with regards to late toxicity and cosmesis.
تدمد: 0360-3016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.044
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3b3a97798dc2001fce20d3e7e7369ead
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.044
Rights: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....3b3a97798dc2001fce20d3e7e7369ead
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:03603016
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.044