Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples
المؤلفون: Natalia Marek-Trzonkowska, David R. Goodlett, Jakub Faktor, Ryszard T. Smolenski, Borek Vojtesek, Zuzanna Urban-Wójciuk, Ted R. Hupp, Łukasz Arcimowicz, Elżbieta Chruściel, Paul Brennan, Sofian Al Shboul, Irena Dapic, Artur Pirog, Sachin Kote
المصدر: Pirog, A, Faktor, J, Urban-wojciuk, Z, Kote, S, Chruściel, E, Arcimowicz, Ł, Marek-trzonkowska, N, Vojtesek, B, Hupp, T R, Al Shboul, S, Brennan, P M, Smoleński, R T, Goodlett, D R & Dapic, I 2021, ' Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples ', Talanta, vol. 233, pp. 122568 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122568
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Proteomics, Paraffin Embedding, Proteome, Formalin fixed paraffin embedded, Chemistry, Reproducibility of Results, Computational biology, Analytical Chemistry, Formaldehyde, T cell subset, Humans, Digestion, Sample preparation, Sample collection, Biomarker discovery
الوصف: Proteomics of human tissues and isolated cellular subpopulations create new opportunities for therapy and monitoring of a patients’ treatment in the clinic. Important considerations in such analysis include recovery of adequate amounts of protein for analysis and reproducibility in sample collection. In this study we compared several protocols for proteomic sample preparation: i) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP), ii) in-solution digestion (ISD) and iii) a pressure-assisted digestion (PCT) method. PCT method is known for already a decade [1], however it is not widely used in proteomic research. We assessed protocols for proteome profiling of isolated immune cell subsets and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Our results show that the ISD method has very good efficiency of protein and peptide identification from the whole proteome, while the FASP method is particularly effective in identification of membrane proteins. Pressure-assisted digestion methods generally provide lower numbers of protein/peptide identifications, but have gained in popularity due to their shorter digestion time making them considerably faster than for ISD or FASP. Furthermore, PCT does not result in substantial sample loss when applied to samples of 50 000 cells. Analysis of FFPE tissues shows comparable results. ISD method similarly yields the highest number of identifications. Furthermore, proteins isolated from FFPE samples show a significant reduction of cleavages at lysine sites due to chemical modifications with formaldehyde-such as methylation (+14 Da) being among the most common. The data we present will be helpful for making decisions about the robust preparation of clinical samples for biomarker discovery and studies on pathomechanisms of various diseases.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
تدمد: 0039-9140
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122568
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3552e8f091953e30bc9b2131a5e348a1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122568
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....3552e8f091953e30bc9b2131a5e348a1
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:00399140
DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122568