No Association of Abacavir Use With Myocardial Infarction

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: No Association of Abacavir Use With Myocardial Infarction
المؤلفون: Eugenio Andraca-Carrera, Peter S. Miele, Kendall A. Marcus, Charles K. Cooper, Cynthia Kornegay, Xiao Ding, Mat Soukup
المصدر: JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 61:441-447
بيانات النشر: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2012.
سنة النشر: 2012
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Anti-HIV Agents, Myocardial Infarction, HIV Infections, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, law, Abacavir, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Adverse effect, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, United States Food and Drug Administration, business.industry, Absolute risk reduction, Middle Aged, Dideoxynucleosides, United States, Confidence interval, Clinical trial, Regimen, Infectious Diseases, Meta-analysis, Female, business, medicine.drug
الوصف: BACKGROUND Several studies have reported an association between abacavir (ABC) exposure and increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) among HIV-infected individuals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a pooled analysis by GlaxoSmithKline, however, do not support this association. To better estimate the effect of ABC use on risk of MI, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted a trial-level meta-analysis of RCTs in which ABC use was randomized as part of a combined antiretroviral regimen. METHODS From a literature search conducted among 4 databases, 26 RCTs were selected that met the following criteria: conducted in adults, sample size more than 50 subjects, status completed, not a pharmacokinetic trial, and not conducted in Africa. The Mantel-Haenszel method, with risk difference and 95% confidence interval, was used for the primary analysis, along with additional alternative analyses, based on FDA-requested adverse event reports of MI provided by each investigator. RESULTS The 26 RCTs were conducted from 1996 to 2010, and included 9868 subjects (5028 ABC and 4840 non-ABC). Mean follow-up was 1.43 person-years in the ABC group and 1.49 person-years in the non-ABC group. Forty-six (0.47%) MI events were reported [24 (0.48%) ABC and 22 (0.46%) non-ABC], with no significant difference noted between the 2 groups (risk difference of 0.008% with 95% confidence interval: -0.26% to 0.27%). CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, our study represents the largest trial-level meta-analysis to date of clinical trials in which ABC use was randomized. Our analysis found no association between ABC use and MI risk.
تدمد: 1525-4135
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0b013e31826f993c
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3494efdd9530031bdce4b230fdbf26f4
https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0b013e31826f993c
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....3494efdd9530031bdce4b230fdbf26f4
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:15254135
DOI:10.1097/qai.0b013e31826f993c