Assessment of the accuracy and stability of frameless gamma knife radiosurgery

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Assessment of the accuracy and stability of frameless gamma knife radiosurgery
المؤلفون: Hyun Tai Chung, Yong Kyun Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Kook Jin Chun, Woo-Yoon Park
المصدر: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
بيانات النشر: Wiley, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: gamma knife, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, Gamma knife radiosurgery, Gamma knife, Radiosurgery, Imaging phantom, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, whole procedure test, 0302 clinical medicine, Radiation Oncology Physics, Humans, Dosimetry, Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, frameless radiosurgery, Radiation, medicine.diagnostic_test, Phantoms, Imaging, business.industry, positional accuracy, Isocenter, image coregistration, Radiotherapy Dosage, Magnetic resonance imaging, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Anthropomorphic phantom, business, Fiducial marker, Nuclear medicine, Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
الوصف: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and stability of frameless gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). The accuracies of the radiation isocenter and patient couch movement were evaluated by film dosimetry with a half‐year cycle. Radiation isocenter assessment with a diode detector and cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) image accuracy tests were performed daily with a vendor‐provided tool for one and a half years after installation. CBCT image quality was examined twice a month with a phantom. The accuracy of image coregistration using CBCT images was studied using magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images of another phantom. The overall positional accuracy was measured in whole procedure tests using film dosimetry with an anthropomorphic phantom. The positional errors of the radiation isocenter at the center and at an extreme position were both less than 0.1 mm. The three‐dimensional deviation of the CBCT coordinate system was stable for one and a half years (mean 0.04 ± 0.02 mm). Image coregistration revealed a difference of 0.2 ± 0.1 mm between CT and CBCT images and a deviation of 0.4 ± 0.2 mm between MR and CBCT images. The whole procedure test of the positional accuracy of the mask‐based irradiation revealed an accuracy of 0.5 ± 0.6 mm. The radiation isocenter accuracy, patient couch movement accuracy, and Gamma Knife Icon CBCT accuracy were all approximately 0.1 mm and were stable for one and a half years. The coordinate system assigned to MR images through coregistration was more accurate than the system defined by fiducial markers. Possible patient motion during irradiation should be considered when evaluating the overall accuracy of frameless GKRS.
تدمد: 1526-9914
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12365
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2f864ea806f367ec62eb6b27574a3766
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12365
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....2f864ea806f367ec62eb6b27574a3766
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:15269914
DOI:10.1002/acm2.12365