NanoRelease: pilot interlaboratory comparison of a weathering protocol applied to resilient and labile polymers with and without embedded carbon nanotubes

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: NanoRelease: pilot interlaboratory comparison of a weathering protocol applied to resilient and labile polymers with and without embedded carbon nanotubes
المؤلفون: Socorro Vázquez-Campos, Brad Acrey, Chia-Ying Chen, Richard G. Zepp, Wendel Wohlleben, Ernest Walton, Endalkachew Sahle-Demessie, Christopher T. Kingston, Philipp Müller, Heiko Egenolf, Janet Carter
المصدر: Carbon
بيانات النشر: Elsevier, 2016.
سنة النشر: 2016
مصطلحات موضوعية: chemistry.chemical_classification, Reproducibility, Materials science, Chemistry(all), Abrasion (mechanical), Nanotechnology, 02 engineering and technology, General Chemistry, Polymer, Carbon nanotube, 010501 environmental sciences, 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology, Mass spectrometry, 01 natural sciences, Article, law.invention, Matrix (chemical analysis), Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation, chemistry, Chemical engineering, law, General Materials Science, Inductively coupled plasma, 0210 nano-technology, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
الوصف: A major use of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) is as functional fillers embedded in a solid matrix, such as plastics or coatings. Weathering and abrasion of the solid matrix during use can lead to environmental releases of the MWCNTs. Here we focus on a protocol to identify and quantify the primary release induced by weathering, and assess reproducibility, transferability, and sensitivity towards different materials and uses. We prepared 132 specimens of two polymer-MWCNT composites containing the same grade of MWCNTs used in earlier OECD hazard assessments but without UV stabilizer. We report on a pilot inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) with four labs (two US and two EU) aging by UV and rain, then shipping for analysis. Two labs (one US and one EU) conducted the release sampling and analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Inductively Coupled Plasma- Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), Ultraviolet–Visible Spectroscopy (UV–Vis), Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC), and Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation (AF4). We compare results between aging labs, between analysis labs and between materials. Surprisingly, we found quantitative agreement between analysis labs for TEM, ICP-MS, UV–Vis; low variation between aging labs by all methods; and consistent rankings of release between TEM, ICP-MS, UV–Vis, AUC. Significant disagreement was related primarily to differences in aging, but even these cases remained within a factor of two.
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.011
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::18f6befd704a527dddfed25543ea58e0
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.011
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....18f6befd704a527dddfed25543ea58e0
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.011