Values in Welfare Economics
العنوان: | Values in Welfare Economics |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Antoinette Baujard |
المساهمون: | Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM), Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon - Saint-Etienne (GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne), École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Conrad Heilmann, Julian Reiss, Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique (GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne), École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Dao, Taï |
المصدر: | The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics Conrad Heilmann; Julian Reiss. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, Routledge, pp.211-222, 2021, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics, 9781138824201. ⟨10.4324/9781315739793-19⟩ The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics ISBN: 9781315739793 |
بيانات النشر: | HAL CCSD, 2021. |
سنة النشر: | 2021 |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | transparency, neutrality, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, value judgement, facts and values, [SHS.HISPHILSO]Humanities and Social Sciences/History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences, welfarism, JEL: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches/B.B4 - Economic Methodology/B.B4.B41 - Economic Methodology, JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement, demarcation, Welfare economics, normative and positive, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D60 - General |
الوصف: | International audience; This chapter focuses on the inner rationale and consequences of four different archetypal positions regarding how ethical and political values are tackled in welfare economics. Welfare economics is standardly associated with the welfarist framework, for which social welfare is based on individual utility only. Beyond this, we distinguish the value-neutrality claim – for which ethical values should be and are out of the scope of welfare economics –, the value confinement ideal – for which ethical values are acceptable if they are minimal and consensual–, the transparency requirement – for which any ethical values may be acceptable in the welfare economics framework if explicit and formalized –, and the entanglement claim – which challenges the very possibility of demarcation between facts and values. |
وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
اللغة: | English |
ردمك: | 978-1-138-82420-1 978-1-315-73979-3 |
DOI: | 10.4324/9781315739793-19⟩ |
URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1855f4d3e37c598c4c378cb80c92e5f2 https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03894792 |
Rights: | OPEN |
رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....1855f4d3e37c598c4c378cb80c92e5f2 |
قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
ردمك: | 9781138824201 9781315739793 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.4324/9781315739793-19⟩ |