Land-Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Removal and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Services and the Sustainable Development Goals
| العنوان: | Land-Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Removal and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Services and the Sustainable Development Goals |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Florian Kraxner, Saskia Keesstra, Sabine Fuss, Jan C. Minx, David J. Beerling, Phil Renforth, Nikolas Hagemann, Bronson W. Griscom, Tim Beringer, Jose Luis Vicente Vicente, Pete Smith, Alexander Popp, Katherine Calvin, Justin Adams, Claudia Kammann |
| المصدر: | Annual Review of Environment and Resources 44 (2019) Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 255-286 Annual Review of Environment and Resources |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences, Water en Landgebruik, Natural resource economics, Land management, Carbon dioxide removal, SDG, 010501 environmental sciences, CDR, 01 natural sciences, 12. Responsible consumption, Ecosystem services, Soil, wetland restoration, Soil, Water and Land Use, soil carbon sequestration, Bodem, negative emission technology, afforestation/reforestation, 11. Sustainability, Greenhouse gas removal, BECCS, NCPs, biochar, UN Sustainable Development Goals, carbon dioxide removal, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences, General Environmental Science, Sustainable development, Water and Land Use, Carbon capture and storage (timeline), Reforestation, Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, greenhouse gas removal, 15. Life on land, PE&RC, Bodem, Water en Landgebruik, 6. Clean water, NET, 13. Climate action, Nature's Contributions to People, Environmental science, ecosystem services, terrestrial enhanced weathering |
| الوصف: | Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal (GGR) include afforestation or reforestation (AR), wetland restoration, soil carbon sequestration (SCS), biochar, terrestrial enhanced weathering (TEW), and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). We assess the opportunities and risks associated with these options through the lens of their potential impacts on ecosystem services (Nature's Contributions to People; NCPs) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We find that all land-based GGR options contribute positively to at least some NCPs and SDGs. Wetland restoration and SCS almost exclusively deliver positive impacts. A few GGR options, such as afforestation, BECCS, and biochar potentially impact negatively some NCPs and SDGs, particularly when implemented at scale, largely through competition for land. For those that present risks or are least understood, more research is required, and demonstration projects need to proceed with caution. For options that present low risks and provide cobenefits, implementation can proceed more rapidly following no-regrets principles. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf; application/octet-stream |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1543-5938 |
| DOI: | 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::01686965ff73c64f733effea66cdf48b https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129 |
| Rights: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....01686965ff73c64f733effea66cdf48b |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15435938 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129 |