A Comparison of Surface Layer and Surface Turbulent Flux Observations over the Labrador Sea with ECMWF Analyses and NCEP Reanalyses
| العنوان: | A Comparison of Surface Layer and Surface Turbulent Flux Observations over the Labrador Sea with ECMWF Analyses and NCEP Reanalyses |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Peter S. Guest, G. W. K. Moore, Ian A. Renfrew, Karl Bumke |
| المصدر: | Journal of Physical Oceanography. 32:383-400 |
| بيانات النشر: | American Meteorological Society, 2002. |
| سنة النشر: | 2002 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Weather forecasting, Sensible heat, Oceanography, computer.software_genre, Wind speed, Atmosphere, Sea surface temperature, Roughness length, 13. Climate action, Latent heat, Climatology, Environmental science, 14. Life underwater, Surface layer, computer |
| الوصف: | Comparisons are made between a time series of meteorological surface layer observational data taken on board the R/V Knorr, and model analysis data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The observational data were gathered during a winter cruise of the R/V Knorr, from 6 February to 13 March 1997, as part of the Labrador Sea Deep Convection Experiment. The surface layer observations generally compare well with both model representations of the wintertime atmosphere. The biases that exist are mainly related to discrepancies in the sea surface temperature or the relative humidity of the analyses. The surface layer observations are used to generate bulk estimates of the surface momentum flux, and the surface sensible and latent heat fluxes. These are then compared with the model-generated turbulent surface fluxes. The ECMWF surface sensible and latent heat flux time series compare reasonably well, with overestimates of only 13% and 10%, respectively. In contrast, the NCEP model overestimates the bulk fluxes by 51% and 27%, respectively. The differences between the bulk estimates and those of the two models are due to different surface heat flux algorithms. It is shown that the roughness length formula used in the NCEP reanalysis project is inappropriate for moderate to high wind speeds. Its failings are acute for situations of large air–sea temperature difference and high wind speed, that is, for areas of high sensible heat fluxes such as the Labrador Sea, the Norwegian Sea, the Gulf Stream, and the Kuroshio. The new operational NCEP bulk algorithm is found to be more appropriate for such areas. It is concluded that surface turbulent flux fields from the ECMWF are within the bounds of observational uncertainty and therefore suitable for driving ocean models. This is in contrast to the surface flux fields from the NCEP reanalysis project, where the application of a more suitable algorithm to the model surface-layer meteorological data is recommended |
| تدمد: | 1520-0485 0022-3670 |
| DOI: | 10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0383:acosla>2.0.co;2 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b3ca428033f70d57dcd31310826b744c https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0383:acosla>2.0.co;2 |
| Rights: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi...........b3ca428033f70d57dcd31310826b744c |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15200485 00223670 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0383:acosla>2.0.co;2 |