Methods comparison

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Methods comparison
المؤلفون: Kate R. Schumann, Janice C. Pedersen, Kathy Toohey-Kurth, Monica M. Reising, Barbara M. Martin, Beate Crossley, Richard H. Jacobson, David Siev, Patricia S. Glas
المصدر: Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 26:480-487
بيانات النشر: SAGE Publications, 2014.
سنة النشر: 2014
مصطلحات موضوعية: General Veterinary, Animal health, Method comparison, Computer science, Clinical study design, Data mining, Sensitivity (control systems), Repeatability, computer.software_genre, computer
الوصف: The current report discusses the process in which a methods comparison study in the National Animal Health Laboratory Network is performed. Specific details are provided for designing and analyzing studies intended to evaluate analytical sensitivity, efficiency, analytical specificity, cross-contamination, repeatability, operator variability, and to compare the performance of methods using diagnostic samples. As an example, a case study is presented comparing the performance of a candidate reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) chemistry to the current RT-PCR chemistry in use when the assay was originally validated. The present study revealed that, for all of the validation factors evaluated, the candidate method performed at least as well and generally better than the current method. The candidate method was, therefore, deemed fit for the original intended purpose of the current method and rendered acceptable for use. A discussion of the case study is intended to further motivate consideration of the study designs chosen.
تدمد: 1943-4936
1040-6387
DOI: 10.1177/1040638714535402
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b33fd18ed5f92c8280ad8e350fd1f673
https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638714535402
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi...........b33fd18ed5f92c8280ad8e350fd1f673
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:19434936
10406387
DOI:10.1177/1040638714535402