Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome
المؤلفون: Eduardo A. Rodriguez, Michael Lehrer, Cindy Azevedo, Michael A. Golafshar, Natalie Ertz-Archambault, Blanca Lizaola-Mayo, Sarah K. Macklin-Mantia, Lisa A. Boardman, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Richard R. Sharp, Luke Mountjoy, C.S. Thorpe, Pedro L.S. Uson, Megan M. Hager, Nathan Y. Yu, Katie L. Kunze, Scott H. Okuno, Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson, Aleksandar Sekulic, Margaret Klint, Robert L. Nussbaum, Deborah J. Rhodes, Edward D. Esplin, N. Jewel Samadder, Alan H. Bryce, Myra J. Wick, Neej J. Patel, A. Keith Stewart
المصدر: JAMA Oncology. 7:230
بيانات النشر: American Medical Association (AMA), 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Cancer, Guideline, Disease, medicine.disease, Germline, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Internal medicine, Cancer screening, medicine, 030212 general & internal medicine, Family history, business, Genetic testing, Cohort study
الوصف: Importance Hereditary factors play a key role in the risk of developing several cancers. Identification of a germline predisposition can have important implications for treatment decisions, risk-reducing interventions, cancer screening, and germline testing. Objective To examine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in patients with cancer using a universal testing approach compared with targeted testing based on clinical guidelines and the uptake of cascade family variant testing (FVT). Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter cohort study assessed germline genetic alterations among patients with solid tumor cancer receiving care at Mayo Clinic cancer centers and a community practice between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. Patients were not selected based on cancer type, disease stage, family history of cancer, ethnicity, or age. Exposures Germline sequencing using a greater than 80-gene next-generation sequencing platform. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of PGVs detected with a universal strategy compared with a guideline-directed approach and uptake of cascade FVT in families. Results A total of 2984 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [12.2] years; 1582 [53.0%] male) were studied. Pathogenic germline variants were found in 397 patients (13.3%), including 282 moderate- and high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes. Variants of uncertain significance were found in 1415 patients (47.4%). A total of 192 patients (6.4%) had incremental clinically actionable findings that would not have been detected by phenotype or family history–based testing criteria. Of those with a high-penetrance PGV, 42 patients (28.2%) had modifications in their treatment based on the finding. Only younger age of diagnosis was associated with presence of PGV. Only 70 patients (17.6%) with PGVs had family members undergoing no-cost cascade FVT. Conclusions and Relevance This prospective, multicenter cohort study found that universal multigene panel testing among patients with solid tumor cancer was associated with an increased detection of heritable variants over the predicted yield of targeted testing based on guidelines. Nearly 30% of patients with high-penetrance variants had modifications in their treatment. Uptake of cascade FVT was low despite being offered at no cost.
تدمد: 2374-2437
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2d945dea4ca0120a0c1362845be7ab19
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252
Rights: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi...........2d945dea4ca0120a0c1362845be7ab19
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:23742437
DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252