التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Effectiveness of Three Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. |
| المؤلفون: |
Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo, Rodriguez, Juan Carlos, Rudek, Ivan, Benavides, Erika, Rios, Hector, Hom-Lay Wang |
| المصدر: |
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry; 2014, Vol. 34 Issue 4, preceding p509-521, 14p, 22 Color Photographs, 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
ALVEOLAR process, ANALYSIS of variance, HOMOGRAFTS, PROBABILITY theory, RESEARCH funding, DENTAL extraction, PILOT projects, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, REPEATED measures design, DESCRIPTIVE statistics |
| مستخلص: |
The aim of this pilot study was to obtain preliminary data regarding the effectiveness of three different alveolar ridge preservation modalities as compared with a control. Subjects in need of single-rooted tooth extraction were recruited and randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups: group 1 (control)—collagen plug; group 2—socket grafting and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier; group 3—socket grafting, buccal overbuilding, and PTFE barrier; group 4—socket grafting, collagen barrier, and PTFE barrier. The grafting material used in all groups was an allograft. At 16 weeks, surgical reentry was performed, and a bone core biopsy was harvested for histomorphometric analysis. A cone beam computed tomography scan was obtained at baseline and before surgical reentry. Clinical (keratinized mucosa [KM] and buccolingual ridge width [RW] changes) and volumetric outcomes were statistically analyzed. A total of 20 patients were recruited (5 patients per group). KM and buccolingual RW changes were minimal during the 16-week healing period for all groups, with no statistically significant differences. Volumetric analyses revealed comparable alveolar ridge resorption values for groups 1, 2, and 4 (3%, 7%, and 5%, respectively), while group 3 exhibited more reduction (16%). Histomorphometric analysis revealed the presence of adequate average values of mineralized tissue (group 1, 46.4%; group 2, 28.88%; group 3, 48.81%; group 4, 41.13%). Based on the clinical and volumetric outcomes, none of the ridge preservation modalities was superior to the control. The combination allograft (freeze-dried bone allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft) employed in this study appears to be a safe and adequate biomaterial for intraoral grafting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |