التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Measuring New Public Management and Governance in Political Debate. |
| المؤلفون: |
Fattore, Giovanni, Dubois, Hans F. W., Lapenta, Antonio |
| المصدر: |
Public Administration Review; Mar/Apr2012, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p218-227, 10p, 5 Charts |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PUBLIC administration research, POLITICAL science research -- Methodology, ELECTORAL coalitions, UNITED States political parties, POLITICAL planning |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
UNITED States |
| مستخلص: |
New Public Management (NPM) recently has been compared and contrasted with public governance (PG) to illustrate shifts in conceptions of public administrations and in reform agendas. The authors develop measures to capture the relevance of NPM and PG in textual discourse and investigate the extent to which they have entered the political debate. Content analysis of electoral programs for the 2005 Italian regional elections reveals that even in this legalistic country, considerable attention was paid to both NPM and PG issues. An important explanatory variable in preference for NPM or PG is party ideology, highlighting often-ignored within-country dynamics. Furthermore, the authors show how a methodological approach adapted from mainly political science and business research can be exploited in the field of public administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |