Academic Journal

Cost-effective analysis focused on hypoglycemia of intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes adults: a ISCHIA randomized clinical trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cost-effective analysis focused on hypoglycemia of intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes adults: a ISCHIA randomized clinical trial.
المؤلفون: Sakane, Naoki, Matsuhisa, Munehide, Kuroda, Akio, Miura, Junnosuke, Hirota, Yushi, Kato, Ken, Toyoda, Masao, Kouyama, Ryuji, Kouyama, Kunichi, Shimada, Akira, Kawashima, Satoshi, Matoba, Yuka, Meguro, Shu, Kusunoki, Yoshiki, Hida, Kazuyuki, Tanaka, Tsuyoshi, Domichi, Masayuki, Suganuma, Akiko, Suzuki, Shota, Tone, Atsuhito
المصدر: Diabetology International; Jan2025, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p78-85, 8p
مستخلص: Background: This study aimed to compare the economic value of intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: Participants were placed on either an isCGM or SMBG arm for 84 days, in a randomized, crossover setup with a 28-day washout period. Clinically relevant hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) and severe hypoglycemia (SH) risks were calculated by analyzing the data from isCGM. The effectiveness variable was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs included medical costs related to the SMBG device. In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis using a tornado diagram to confirm the robustness of the results. Patients: A total of 93 Japanese T1D adults (51.4 ± 15.3 years old, male 47.3%, and HbA1c 7.3 ± 0.7%) treated with multiple daily insulin injection (MDI). Results: Compared to the SMBG arm, clinically relevant hypoglycemia and SH risks over daytime (2.7 ± 1.7 vs. 2.4 ± 1.6 times; P = 0.008 and 3.1 ± 3.2 vs. 2.2 ± 2.7; P = 0.001) and night-time periods (2.1 ± 1.6 → 1.7 ± 1.2; P < 0.001 and 5.1 ± 4.0 → 4.2 ± 3.8; P = 0.013) were reduced with isCGM treatment. The isCGM system was associated with an incremental gain in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) of 0.8 QALYs compared with the SMBG arm (74.6 vs. 73.8 QALYs). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was JPY 4,398,932 (US$41,212) per QALY gained, which is well below the generally accepted cost-effectiveness threshold. SH during the daytime period was the primary driver of the incremental QALE. Conclusion: The findings suggest that isCGM use for Japanese T1D adults treated with MDI is cost saving relative to SMBG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Diabetology International is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:21901678
DOI:10.1007/s13340-024-00762-1