التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Optimization of Sprint Training Among European Coaches: Quality Over Quantity. |
| المؤلفون: |
Agudo-Ortega, Aarón, Sandbakk, Øyvind, Salinero, Juan J., Johansen, Bjørn, González-Rave, José M. |
| المصدر: |
International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance; Sep2024, Vol. 19 Issue 9, p905-913, 9p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
EXERCISE physiology, BIOMECHANICS, CONVERSATION, QUESTIONNAIRES, COOLDOWN, RUNNING, ACCELERATION (Mechanics), COACHES (Athletics), PHYSICAL training & conditioning, MUSCLE strength, RESEARCH methodology, ATHLETIC ability, COUNSELING, JUMPING, PSYCHOSOCIAL factors, SPRINTING, TIME, RELAXATION for health, PHYSIOLOGICAL effects of acceleration |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
EUROPE |
| مستخلص: |
Purpose: To describe how high-level European sprint coaches (from 100 to 400 m) work to improve important factors associated with the quality of the holistic training process and the quality of the specific training session. Methods: A descriptive analysis was conducted using questionnaires from 31 European elite sprint coaches (ie, training athletes defined as tiers 3, 4, and 5) who participated voluntarily. Results: The coaches used traditional periodization (45%) with a 10- to 15-day tapering phase (48%) that includes a reduction in volume, maintenance of intensity, and focus on correct technical execution. In the 3 mesophases, coaches prioritized the basic development of strength and sprint work in the first phases of the season and emphasized more sprint-specific work in the competitive phase. Before sessions, adjustments were made based on factors such as psychological (77%), technical (48%), and physical (39%) parameters. In-session load management relies on a combination of objective and subjective measures (55%), in which the dialogue with athletes (65%) was regarded as the main resource. Feedback during and after sessions covers technical (54%), psychological (48%), and physical (35%) aspects. Recovery protocols after sessions mainly involve rest and professional guidance (42%). For performance assessment and testing, coaches utilize countermovement jump (52%), force–velocity profile (45%), and 30-m flying (61%) as main tools. Conclusions: European sprint coaches demonstrated a comprehensive approach to planning and management, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of their training methodologies and the diverse tools employed for athlete testing and monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance is the property of Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |