Academic Journal

Safety and Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) Following Bland Embolization for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Safety and Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) Following Bland Embolization for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
المؤلفون: Alayli, Adam, Ngo, Hoang, Sikaria, Dhiraj, Ahmed, Altan, Salloum, Elias, Strosberg, Jonathan R., Al-Toubah, Taymeyah E., Kis, Bela, Haider, Mintallah, El-Haddad, Ghassan
المصدر: Cancers; Aug2024, Vol. 16 Issue 15, p2703, 8p
مصطلحات موضوعية: RADIOISOTOPE therapy, PATIENT safety, HEPATOTOXICOLOGY, STATISTICAL significance, THERAPEUTIC embolization, RETROSPECTIVE studies, TREATMENT duration, CANCER patients, METASTASIS, KAPLAN-Meier estimator, NEUROENDOCRINE tumors, DRUG efficacy, SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC factors, PROGRESSION-free survival, CELL receptors, TIME, EVALUATION
مستخلص: Simple Summary: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using 177Lu-DOTATATE is a standard therapy for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Many patients with liver-dominant disease undergo liver embolization as an earlier line of treatment. It is unclear whether prior embolization impacts the safety and efficacy of subsequent 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment. We analyzed 171 patients who underwent treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE, among whom 61 underwent prior embolization. There was no significant difference in serious liver toxicity or radiographic progression of liver tumors between the group that had undergone prior embolization and the group that had not. The conclusion is that peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients who had prior liver embolization is both safe and effective. Rationale: Evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs) who have undergone prior bland hepatic transarterial embolization (TAE). Methods: Retrospective review of mNET patients who received PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE between 4/2018 and 02/2022 with and without prior TAE. The most recent clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings, including hepatic Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, were compared to pre-PRRT. Results: 171 patients (95 M, 76 F, median age = 66) with mNET of different primary sites (9 foregut, 100 midgut, 9 hindgut, 44 pancreas, 9 unknown) received at least 1 cycle of PRRT with at least 6 months of follow-up, 110 of whom were embolization-naïve and 61 who had prior TAE. The median follow up was 22 months (range: 6–43). Patients with prior TAE had higher liver tumor burden on average than patients without prior TAE; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the rates of G3 or G4 hepatotoxicity (p = 0.548 and p = 0.999, respectively) in patients who underwent prior TAE and those who were TAE-naïve. The hepatic progression-free survival was 22.9 months in TAE-naïve patients and 25.7, 20.2, and 12.8 months in patients with 1, 2, and 3 prior TAE treatments, respectively. Conclusion: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy following transarterial bland embolization for mNET is safe and effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cancers is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:20726694
DOI:10.3390/cancers16152703