Academic Journal

Does the volume of supplemental intraligamentary injections affect the anaesthetic success rate after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block? A randomized-double blind clinical trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Does the volume of supplemental intraligamentary injections affect the anaesthetic success rate after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block? A randomized-double blind clinical trial.
المؤلفون: Aggarwal, V., Singla, M., Miglani, S., Kohli, S., Sharma, V., Bhasin, S. S.
المصدر: International Endodontic Journal; Jan2018, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p5-11, 7p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 1 Graph
مصطلحات موضوعية: ANESTHETICS, PHARMACODYNAMICS, LIDOCAINE, NERVE block, INJECTIONS, ALVEOLAR nerve
مستخلص: Aim To investigate the efficacy of 0.2 mL vs. 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine when given as a supplementary intraligamentary injection after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Methodology Ninety-seven adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpits received an IANB and root canal treatment was initiated. Pain during treatment was recorded using a visual analogue scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Patients with unsuccessful anaesthesia ( n = 78) randomly received intraligamentary injection of either 0.2 mL or 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80 000 epinephrine. Root canal treatment was reinitiated. Success after primary injection or supplementary injection was defined as no or mild pain ( HP VAS score ≤54 mm) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. Heart rate was monitored using a finger pulse oximeter. The anaesthetic success rates were analysed with Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate changes were analysed using t-tests. Results The intraligamentary injections with 0.2 mL solution gave an anaesthetic success rate of 64%, whilst the 0.6 mL was successful in 84% of cases with failed primary IANB. (χ2 = 4.3, P = 0.03). There was no significant effect of the volume of intraligamentary injection on the change in heart rate. Conclusions Increasing the volume of intraligamentary injection improved the success rates after a failed primary anaesthetic injection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Endodontic Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:01432885
DOI:10.1111/iej.12773