التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
On the connection between lying, asserting, and intending to cause beliefs. |
| المؤلفون: |
Krstić, Vladimir1 (AUTHOR) drpop1@yahoo.com |
| المصدر: |
Inquiry. Feb2025, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p643-662. 20p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
ARGUMENT, DECEPTION |
| مستخلص: |
According to one influential argument put forward by, e.g. Chisholm and Feehan, Pfister, Meibauer, Dynel, Keiser, and Harris, asserting requires intending to give your hearer a reason to believe what you say (first premise) and, because liars must assert what they believe is false (second premise), liars necessarily intend to cause their hearer to believe as true what the liars believe is false (conclusion). According to this argument, that is, all genuine lies are intended to deceive. 'Lies' not intended to deceive are not genuine lies because they do not involve assertions and you need to assert in order to lie. In this paper, I reject this argument by arguing that the first premise is false: intending to give your hearer a reason to believe what you say is not necessary for asserting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Inquiry is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Business Source Index |