التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Metodologija povezovanja inteligenc 4Q ali pot do ustrezne presoje. |
| Alternate Title: |
Methodology of Connecting the 4Q Intelligences or Reaching Suitable Judgement. |
| المؤلفون: |
Mulej, Lucija1 lucija.mulej@budnjani.si |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Universal Excellence (JUE) / Revija za Univerzalno Odličnost (RUO). Sep2024, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p211-231. 21p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
RESEARCH questions, MORAL judgment, JUDGMENT (Psychology), SOCIAL ethics, NEUROSCIENCES |
| Abstract (English): |
Research Question (RQ): How to find a system of reasoning (analysis and synthesis) to be able to encompass the wholeness of the phenomenon under study? Purpose: The purpose of this article is to present and analyze an assessment proposal called Connecting Intelligences 4 Q. Method: In the research, we used qualitative methodology, comparative content analysis. The research is analytical, it examines the qualitative experience of the author and supports it with literature from the fields of linguistics, psychoanalysis, neurology and sociology. The method of reasoning is both inductive and deductive. Results: Assessment must be balanced, interdisciplinary and aimed at building integrated assessment models. The proposed solution encourages further research into the concept of judgment and analyzes it at the levels of cognition, emotion and neurology. Organization: The proposal is applicable to both organizations and groups, as it deals with the natural human ability to analyze and synthesize, i.e. the comprehensive ability to judge. Since human engagement is always related to cooperation, connection and communication, the proposed model can be useful and practically applicable. Society: The proposal supports the sustainable development of society, as it deals with key topics that support broader social issues and the ethics of individuals as members of society. At the same time, it shows how we can judge from the levels of mind (IQ), emotion (EQ), spirit (SQ) and body (PQ). It thereby includes interdisciplinarity and gives it a key focus in the assessment. Originality: The proposed solution is interesting, as it connects sociological, anthropological and neurological science. It offers practical ideas and guidance on how to connect levels that are different and how to pave the way to balanced ethical judgment. Limitations/Future Research: In the research, we focused on the qualitative method with content analysis. However, we recommend concrete models and further research on the assessment itself, both on the cognitive and emotional levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Slovenian): |
Raziskovalno vprašanje (RV): Kako poiskati sistem sklepanja (analize in sinteze), da bi lahko zaobjeli celovitost fenomena proučevanja? Namen: Namen tega članka je predstavitev in analiza predloga za presojo, imenovanega Povezovanje inteligenc 4 Q. Metoda: V raziskavi smo uporabili kvalitativno metodologijo, komparativno analizo vsebine. Raziskava je analitična, proučuje kvalitativno izkustvo avtorice in ga podkrepi z literaturo iz področja lingvistike, psihoanalize, nevrologije in sociologije. Metoda sklepanja je tako induktivna kot deduktivna. Rezultati: Presoja mora biti uravnotežena, interdisciplinarna in usmerjena v izgradnjo celostnih modelov presoje. Predlagana rešitev spodbuja k nadaljnjim raziskovanjem pojma presoje in ga analizira na ravneh kognicije, emocije in nevrologije. Organizacija: Predlog je aplikabilen tako na organizacije kot skupine, saj obravnava naravno sposobnost človeka po analizi in sintezi, torej celoviti sposobnosti presoje. Ker je človeško udejstvovanje vselej povezano s sodelovanjem, povezovanjem in komuniciranjem, je predlagan model lahko koristen in praktično uporaben. Družba: Predlog podpira trajnostni razvoj družbe, saj se ukvarja s ključnimi tematikami, ki podpirajo širša družbena vprašanja in etičnost posameznikov kot pripadnikov družbe. Obenem pokaže, kako lahko presojamo iz ravni uma (IQ), čustev (EQ), duha (SQ) in telesa (PQ). S tem vključi interdisciplinarnost in ji prida ključni poudarek pri presoji. Originalnost: Predlagana rešitev je zanimiva, saj povezuje tako sociološko, antropološko kot nevrološko znanost. Nudi praktične ideje in napotke, kako povezovati ravni, ki so si različne, in kako tlakovati poti do uravnotežene etične presoje. Omejitve/nadaljnje raziskovanje: V raziskavi smo se osredotočili na kvalitativno metodo z analizo vsebin. Priporočamo pa konkretne modele in nadaljnje raziskave same presoje tako na kognitivnih kot emotivnih ravneh. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Universal Excellence (JUE) / Revija za Univerzalno Odličnost (RUO) is the property of Fakulteta za Organizacijske Studije v Novem mestu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Business Source Index |
Full Text Finder