التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
مولانا امین احسن اصلاحی کے فقہی اصول کا ائمہ اربعہ کے ساتھ تقابلی جائزہ |
| Alternate Title: |
A Comparative Review of Maulana Amin Ahsan Iṣlaḥī's Jurisprudential Principles with Ayim'a Arba'a. |
| المؤلفون: |
Haq, Mufti Abdul1 hqqanijanan@gmail.com, Qazi, Shabana2 shabanaqazi786@yahoo.com, Gul Tareen, Peree3 pareegul563@gmail.com |
| المصدر: |
Al-Hameed Islamic Studies Research Journal. Sep2024, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p38-55. 18p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*HADITH, *ISLAMIC law, *NARRATION, *GOD in Islam, *JURISPRUDENCE |
| مستخلص: |
The summary of this discussion is that Maulana Amin Ahsan Iṣlaḥī's principles of jurisprudence or principles of Sharia are five in contrast to the Arba'a imams. Then the hadith is followed by ijtihad and the speaker of ijtihad is a collective member who is called Ijmaa, who is the one who strives to make it perfect. There is a detail in Maulana Iṣlaḥī's Principles of the Qur'an that he does not believe in the Qur'an to be ascribed to hadiths by means of abrogation and interpretation, and in the hadith it is detailed that Maulana Iṣlaḥī differentiates between hadith and sunnah, that there is a slight difference between sunnah and hadith, that is, that sunnah refers to the proven method from the Messenger of Allah and hadith to others. There are sayings, actions and speeches which are narrated with the Prophet's narrations, generally since it is proven or disputed, the hadith can be good, correct, weak subject and reversed, but these debates do not arise regarding the Sunnah. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |