Dissertation/ Thesis
Aktuální problémy soudního řízení ve věcech mezinárodní ochrany
| العنوان: | Aktuální problémy soudního řízení ve věcech mezinárodní ochrany |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Current issues of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection |
| المؤلفون: | Křižáková, Markéta |
| Thesis Advisors: | Kryska, David, Rajchl, Jiří |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| المجموعة: | Czech ETDs |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Right to effective remedy, suspensive effect, 32, international protection, time limits, přezkum ex nunc, odkladný účinek, administrative judiciary, procedurální směrnice 2013, Právo na účinný opravný prostředek, Procedural Directive 2013, správní soudnictví, EU, Asylum Act, lhůty, review ex nunc, mezinárodní ochrana, azylový zákon |
| الوصف: | The aim of the diploma thesis "Current issues of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection" is the evaluation whether the amendment of Asylum Act sufficiently fulfils requirements of the procedural Directive 2013/32/EU regarding the right to effective remedy. Namely these requirements are full and ex nunc examination of both fact and points of law that composes large part of this thesis, suspensive effect and time limits. In order to reach the goal of this thesis several questions are given which one of them relates to the right to effective remedy in international, European and national law. Hence the chapter two deals with the right to effective remedy in European Convention on Human Rights, Convention against Torture and International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights same as in EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Czech Republic. Afterwards the thesis presents the main principles of administrative judiciary such as cassation principle and principle ex tunc and specifics of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection. Crucial part of the thesis is the chapter four that analyses above mentioned requirements of procedural Directive 2013/32/EU and transposition of these requirements by the amendment of Asylum Act... |
| Original Identifier: | oai:invenio.nusl.cz:350745 |
| نوع الوثيقة: | masterThesis |
| اللغة: | Czech |
| الاتاحة: | http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-350745 |
| Rights: | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsndl.nusl.cz.oai.invenio.nusl.cz.350745 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations |
| ResultId |
1 |
|---|---|
| Header |
edsndl Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations edsndl.nusl.cz.oai.invenio.nusl.cz.350745 798 3 Dissertation/ Thesis dissertation 798.106689453125 |
| PLink |
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsndl&AN=edsndl.nusl.cz.oai.invenio.nusl.cz.350745&custid=s6537998&authtype=sso |
| FullText |
Array
(
[Availability] => 0
)
Array ( [0] => Array ( [Url] => http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-350745# [Name] => EDS - Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations [Category] => fullText [Text] => View record in Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations [MouseOverText] => View record in Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations ) ) |
| Items |
Array
(
[Name] => Title
[Label] => Title
[Group] => Ti
[Data] => Aktuální problémy soudního řízení ve věcech mezinárodní ochrany
)
Array ( [Name] => TitleTranslated [Label] => Alternate Title [Group] => Ti [Data] => Current issues of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection ) Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Authors [Group] => Au [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Křižáková%2C+Markéta%22">Křižáková, Markéta</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Thesis Advisors [Group] => Au [Data] => Kryska, David<br />Rajchl, Jiří ) Array ( [Name] => DatePubCY [Label] => Publication Year [Group] => Date [Data] => 2017 ) Array ( [Name] => Subset [Label] => Collection [Group] => HoldingsInfo [Data] => Czech ETDs ) Array ( [Name] => Subject [Label] => Subject Terms [Group] => Su [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Right+to+effective+remedy%22">Right to effective remedy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22suspensive+effect%22">suspensive effect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%2232%22">32</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22international+protection%22">international protection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22time+limits%22">time limits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22přezkum+ex+nunc%22">přezkum ex nunc</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22odkladný+účinek%22">odkladný účinek</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22administrative+judiciary%22">administrative judiciary</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22procedurální+směrnice+2013%22">procedurální směrnice 2013</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Právo+na+účinný+opravný+prostředek%22">Právo na účinný opravný prostředek</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Procedural+Directive+2013%22">Procedural Directive 2013</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22správní+soudnictví%22">správní soudnictví</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22EU%22">EU</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Asylum+Act%22">Asylum Act</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22lhůty%22">lhůty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22review+ex+nunc%22">review ex nunc</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22mezinárodní+ochrana%22">mezinárodní ochrana</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22azylový+zákon%22">azylový zákon</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => Abstract [Label] => Description [Group] => Ab [Data] => The aim of the diploma thesis "Current issues of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection" is the evaluation whether the amendment of Asylum Act sufficiently fulfils requirements of the procedural Directive 2013/32/EU regarding the right to effective remedy. Namely these requirements are full and ex nunc examination of both fact and points of law that composes large part of this thesis, suspensive effect and time limits. In order to reach the goal of this thesis several questions are given which one of them relates to the right to effective remedy in international, European and national law. Hence the chapter two deals with the right to effective remedy in European Convention on Human Rights, Convention against Torture and International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights same as in EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Czech Republic. Afterwards the thesis presents the main principles of administrative judiciary such as cassation principle and principle ex tunc and specifics of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection. Crucial part of the thesis is the chapter four that analyses above mentioned requirements of procedural Directive 2013/32/EU and transposition of these requirements by the amendment of Asylum Act... ) Array ( [Name] => AN [Label] => Original Identifier [Group] => ID [Data] => oai:invenio.nusl.cz:350745 ) Array ( [Name] => TypeDocument [Label] => Document Type [Group] => TypDoc [Data] => masterThesis ) Array ( [Name] => Language [Label] => Language [Group] => Lang [Data] => Czech ) Array ( [Name] => URL [Label] => Availability [Group] => URL [Data] => http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-350745 ) Array ( [Name] => Copyright [Label] => Rights [Group] => Cpyrght [Data] => info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess ) Array ( [Name] => AN [Label] => Accession Number [Group] => ID [Data] => edsndl.nusl.cz.oai.invenio.nusl.cz.350745 ) |
| RecordInfo |
Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Languages] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Text] => Czech
)
)
[Subjects] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Right to effective remedy
[Type] => general
)
[1] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => suspensive effect
[Type] => general
)
[2] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => 32
[Type] => general
)
[3] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => international protection
[Type] => general
)
[4] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => time limits
[Type] => general
)
[5] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => přezkum ex nunc
[Type] => general
)
[6] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => odkladný účinek
[Type] => general
)
[7] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => administrative judiciary
[Type] => general
)
[8] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => procedurální směrnice 2013
[Type] => general
)
[9] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Právo na účinný opravný prostředek
[Type] => general
)
[10] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Procedural Directive 2013
[Type] => general
)
[11] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => správní soudnictví
[Type] => general
)
[12] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => EU
[Type] => general
)
[13] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Asylum Act
[Type] => general
)
[14] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => lhůty
[Type] => general
)
[15] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => review ex nunc
[Type] => general
)
[16] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => mezinárodní ochrana
[Type] => general
)
[17] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => azylový zákon
[Type] => general
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => Aktuální problémy soudního řízení ve věcech mezinárodní ochrany
[Type] => main
)
)
)
[BibRelationships] => Array
(
[HasContributorRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Křižáková, Markéta
)
)
)
)
[IsPartOfRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Dates] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[D] => 01
[M] => 01
[Type] => published
[Y] => 2017
)
)
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => issn-locals
[Value] => edsndl
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
| IllustrationInfo |