Academic Journal
How Do Prospective Teachers Argue in Focus Group Discussion? Toulmin's Argumentation Study
| العنوان: | How Do Prospective Teachers Argue in Focus Group Discussion? Toulmin's Argumentation Study |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Mohammad Archi Maulyda, Asri Fauzi, Supriadi Supriadi, Muhammad Erfan, Anton Budiharjo |
| المصدر: | Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 139-149 (2021) |
| بيانات النشر: | Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, 2021. |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Education LCC:Education (General) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | focus group discussion, prospective teachers, toulmin's argumentation, Education, Education (General), L7-991 |
| الوصف: | Students’ argumentation ability is necessary for education today, which emphasizes the student-centered learning process. One way to see students’ argumentation ability is by having a discussion. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the Toulmin argumentation process for students during focus group discussions (FGD). This research is qualitative. The data collection instrument used was an open-ended questionnaire assisted by Google Form that contained common problems of the distance learning process during a pandemic. The subjects of this study consisted of fifty students from the University of Mataram. The results showed that the argumentation process was divided into three categories. The first category was the one-sentence argument. There were 58 %, or 29 students, who belonged in this category. The second category was the two sentences argument. There are 30 %, or 15 students belonged in this category. Lastly, 12 % or six students belonged to the more than three sentence argument category. The results of this study indicated that many students could not provide complete arguments. Thus, the role of lecturers is significant to improve students’ ability in providing complete argumentations. Therefore, the researchers suggest that lecturers should apply learning models that invite students to argue and discuss. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | Indonesian |
| تدمد: | 2301-7562 2579-7964 |
| Relation: | http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadris/article/view/7915; https://doaj.org/toc/2301-7562; https://doaj.org/toc/2579-7964 |
| DOI: | 10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7915 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| ResultId |
1 |
|---|---|
| Header |
edsdoj Directory of Open Access Journals edsdoj.9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6 952 3 Academic Journal academicJournal 951.886840820313 |
| PLink |
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6&custid=s6537998&authtype=sso |
| FullText |
Array
(
[Availability] => 0
)
Array ( [0] => Array ( [Url] => https://doaj.org/article/9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6 [Name] => EDS - DOAJ [Category] => fullText [Text] => View record in DOAJ [MouseOverText] => View record in DOAJ ) ) |
| Items |
Array
(
[Name] => Title
[Label] => Title
[Group] => Ti
[Data] => How Do Prospective Teachers Argue in Focus Group Discussion? Toulmin's Argumentation Study
)
Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Authors [Group] => Au [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mohammad+Archi+Maulyda%22">Mohammad Archi Maulyda</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Asri+Fauzi%22">Asri Fauzi</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Supriadi+Supriadi%22">Supriadi Supriadi</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Muhammad+Erfan%22">Muhammad Erfan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anton+Budiharjo%22">Anton Budiharjo</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => TitleSource [Label] => Source [Group] => Src [Data] => Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 139-149 (2021) ) Array ( [Name] => Publisher [Label] => Publisher Information [Group] => PubInfo [Data] => Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, 2021. ) Array ( [Name] => DatePubCY [Label] => Publication Year [Group] => Date [Data] => 2021 ) Array ( [Name] => Subset [Label] => Collection [Group] => HoldingsInfo [Data] => LCC:Education<br />LCC:Education (General) ) Array ( [Name] => Subject [Label] => Subject Terms [Group] => Su [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22focus+group+discussion%22">focus group discussion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22prospective+teachers%22">prospective teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22toulmin's+argumentation%22">toulmin's argumentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education%22">Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+%28General%29%22">Education (General)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22L7-991%22">L7-991</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => Abstract [Label] => Description [Group] => Ab [Data] => Students’ argumentation ability is necessary for education today, which emphasizes the student-centered learning process. One way to see students’ argumentation ability is by having a discussion. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the Toulmin argumentation process for students during focus group discussions (FGD). This research is qualitative. The data collection instrument used was an open-ended questionnaire assisted by Google Form that contained common problems of the distance learning process during a pandemic. The subjects of this study consisted of fifty students from the University of Mataram. The results showed that the argumentation process was divided into three categories. The first category was the one-sentence argument. There were 58 %, or 29 students, who belonged in this category. The second category was the two sentences argument. There are 30 %, or 15 students belonged in this category. Lastly, 12 % or six students belonged to the more than three sentence argument category. The results of this study indicated that many students could not provide complete arguments. Thus, the role of lecturers is significant to improve students’ ability in providing complete argumentations. Therefore, the researchers suggest that lecturers should apply learning models that invite students to argue and discuss. ) Array ( [Name] => TypeDocument [Label] => Document Type [Group] => TypDoc [Data] => article ) Array ( [Name] => Format [Label] => File Description [Group] => SrcInfo [Data] => electronic resource ) Array ( [Name] => Language [Label] => Language [Group] => Lang [Data] => Indonesian ) Array ( [Name] => ISSN [Label] => ISSN [Group] => ISSN [Data] => 2301-7562<br />2579-7964 ) Array ( [Name] => NoteTitleSource [Label] => Relation [Group] => SrcInfo [Data] => http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadris/article/view/7915; https://doaj.org/toc/2301-7562; https://doaj.org/toc/2579-7964 ) Array ( [Name] => DOI [Label] => DOI [Group] => ID [Data] => 10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7915 ) Array ( [Name] => URL [Label] => Access URL [Group] => URL [Data] => <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://doaj.org/article/9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6" linkWindow="_blank">https://doaj.org/article/9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6</link> ) Array ( [Name] => AN [Label] => Accession Number [Group] => ID [Data] => edsdoj.9fd2187c2dec48b799d661158af532b6 ) |
| RecordInfo |
Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => doi
[Value] => 10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7915
)
)
[Languages] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Text] => Indonesian
)
)
[PhysicalDescription] => Array
(
[Pagination] => Array
(
[PageCount] => 11
[StartPage] => 139
)
)
[Subjects] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => focus group discussion
[Type] => general
)
[1] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => prospective teachers
[Type] => general
)
[2] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => toulmin's argumentation
[Type] => general
)
[3] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Education
[Type] => general
)
[4] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Education (General)
[Type] => general
)
[5] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => L7-991
[Type] => general
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => How Do Prospective Teachers Argue in Focus Group Discussion? Toulmin's Argumentation Study
[Type] => main
)
)
)
[BibRelationships] => Array
(
[HasContributorRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Mohammad Archi Maulyda
)
)
)
[1] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Asri Fauzi
)
)
)
[2] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Supriadi Supriadi
)
)
)
[3] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Muhammad Erfan
)
)
)
[4] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Anton Budiharjo
)
)
)
)
[IsPartOfRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Dates] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[D] => 01
[M] => 06
[Type] => published
[Y] => 2021
)
)
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => issn-print
[Value] => 23017562
)
[1] => Array
(
[Type] => issn-print
[Value] => 25797964
)
)
[Numbering] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => volume
[Value] => 6
)
[1] => Array
(
[Type] => issue
[Value] => 1
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah
[Type] => main
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
| IllustrationInfo |