Academic Journal
Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study
| العنوان: | Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Jeeyeon Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyung Wook Kim, Jongha Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Sung-Wook Hwang, Hyun Deok Shin, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Seok Lee, Yunho Jung, Young-Seok Cho, Young Eun Joo, Dae-Seong Myung, Kyu Chan Huh, Eu Mi Ahn |
| المصدر: | Intestinal Research, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 413-418 (2019) |
| بيانات النشر: | Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, 2019. |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine LCC:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Colonoscopy, Bowel preparation, Oral sulfate solution, Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate, Medicine, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, RC799-869 |
| الوصف: | Background/Aims This study compared the efficacy, compliance, and safety of bowel preparation between sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and oral sulfate solution (OSS). Methods A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed. Split preparation methods were performed in both groups; the SPMC group, 2 sachets on the day before, and 1 sachet on the day of the procedure, the OSS group, half of the OSS with 1 L of water on both the day before and the day of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), adequacy of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, patient satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS), and safety were compared between the 2 groups. Results This study analyzed 229 patients (121 in the SPMC group and 108 in the OSS group). ADR showed no differences between 2 groups (51.7% vs. 41.7%, P>0.05). The mean total BBPS score (7.95 vs. 8.11, P>0.05) and adequate bowel preparation rate (94.9% vs. 96.3%, P>0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The mean VAS score for taste (7.62 vs. 6.87, P=0.006) was significantly higher in the SPMC group than in the OSS group. There were no significant differences in any other safety variables between the 2 groups except nausea symptom (36.1% vs. 20.3%, P=0.008). Conclusions Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using low volume OSS and SPMC yielded similar ADRs and levels of efficacy. SPMC had higher levels of satisfaction for taste and feeling than did OSS. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1598-9100 2288-1956 |
| Relation: | http://www.irjournal.org/upload/pdf/ir-2018-00156.pdf; https://doaj.org/toc/1598-9100; https://doaj.org/toc/2288-1956 |
| DOI: | 10.5217/ir.2018.00156 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/e6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | ResultId |
1 |
|---|---|
| Header |
edsdoj Directory of Open Access Journals edsdoj.6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430 929 3 Academic Journal academicJournal 928.767700195313 |
| PLink |
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430&custid=s6537998&authtype=sso |
| FullText |
Array
(
[Availability] => 0
)
Array ( [0] => Array ( [Url] => https://doaj.org/article/e6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430 [Name] => EDS - DOAJ [Category] => fullText [Text] => View record in DOAJ [MouseOverText] => View record in DOAJ ) [1] => Array ( [Url] => https://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?custid=s6537998&groupid=main&authtype=ip,guest&sid=EBSCO:edsdoj&genre=article&issn=15989100&ISBN=&volume=17&issue=3&date=20190701&spage=413&pages=413-418&title=Intestinal Research&atitle=Clinical%20comparison%20of%20low-volume%20agents%20%28oral%20sulfate%20solution%20and%20sodium%20picosulfate%20with%20magnesium%20citrate%29%20for%20bowel%20preparation%3A%20the%20EASE%20study&id=DOI:10.5217/ir.2018.00156 [Name] => Full Text Finder (s6537998api) [Category] => fullText [Text] => Full Text Finder [Icon] => https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/branding/images/FTF.gif [MouseOverText] => Full Text Finder ) ) |
| Items |
Array
(
[Name] => Title
[Label] => Title
[Group] => Ti
[Data] => Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study
)
Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Authors [Group] => Au [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jeeyeon+Kim%22">Jeeyeon Kim</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hyun+Gun+Kim%22">Hyun Gun Kim</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kyeong+Ok+Kim%22">Kyeong Ok Kim</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hyung+Wook+Kim%22">Hyung Wook Kim</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jongha+Park%22">Jongha Park</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jeong-Sik+Byeon%22">Jeong-Sik Byeon</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sung-Wook+Hwang%22">Sung-Wook Hwang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hyun+Deok+Shin%22">Hyun Deok Shin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jeong+Eun+Shin%22">Jeong Eun Shin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hyo-Joon+Yang%22">Hyo-Joon Yang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hyun+Seok+Lee%22">Hyun Seok Lee</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yunho+Jung%22">Yunho Jung</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Young-Seok+Cho%22">Young-Seok Cho</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Young+Eun+Joo%22">Young Eun Joo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dae-Seong+Myung%22">Dae-Seong Myung</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kyu+Chan+Huh%22">Kyu Chan Huh</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eu+Mi+Ahn%22">Eu Mi Ahn</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => TitleSource [Label] => Source [Group] => Src [Data] => Intestinal Research, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 413-418 (2019) ) Array ( [Name] => Publisher [Label] => Publisher Information [Group] => PubInfo [Data] => Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, 2019. ) Array ( [Name] => DatePubCY [Label] => Publication Year [Group] => Date [Data] => 2019 ) Array ( [Name] => Subset [Label] => Collection [Group] => HoldingsInfo [Data] => LCC:Medicine<br />LCC:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology ) Array ( [Name] => Subject [Label] => Subject Terms [Group] => Su [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Colonoscopy%22">Colonoscopy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bowel+preparation%22">Bowel preparation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Oral+sulfate+solution%22">Oral sulfate solution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sodium+picosulfate+with+magnesium+citrate%22">Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medicine%22">Medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diseases+of+the+digestive+system%2E+Gastroenterology%22">Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RC799-869%22">RC799-869</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => Abstract [Label] => Description [Group] => Ab [Data] => Background/Aims This study compared the efficacy, compliance, and safety of bowel preparation between sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and oral sulfate solution (OSS). Methods A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed. Split preparation methods were performed in both groups; the SPMC group, 2 sachets on the day before, and 1 sachet on the day of the procedure, the OSS group, half of the OSS with 1 L of water on both the day before and the day of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), adequacy of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, patient satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS), and safety were compared between the 2 groups. Results This study analyzed 229 patients (121 in the SPMC group and 108 in the OSS group). ADR showed no differences between 2 groups (51.7% vs. 41.7%, P>0.05). The mean total BBPS score (7.95 vs. 8.11, P>0.05) and adequate bowel preparation rate (94.9% vs. 96.3%, P>0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The mean VAS score for taste (7.62 vs. 6.87, P=0.006) was significantly higher in the SPMC group than in the OSS group. There were no significant differences in any other safety variables between the 2 groups except nausea symptom (36.1% vs. 20.3%, P=0.008). Conclusions Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using low volume OSS and SPMC yielded similar ADRs and levels of efficacy. SPMC had higher levels of satisfaction for taste and feeling than did OSS. ) Array ( [Name] => TypeDocument [Label] => Document Type [Group] => TypDoc [Data] => article ) Array ( [Name] => Format [Label] => File Description [Group] => SrcInfo [Data] => electronic resource ) Array ( [Name] => Language [Label] => Language [Group] => Lang [Data] => English ) Array ( [Name] => ISSN [Label] => ISSN [Group] => ISSN [Data] => 1598-9100<br />2288-1956 ) Array ( [Name] => NoteTitleSource [Label] => Relation [Group] => SrcInfo [Data] => http://www.irjournal.org/upload/pdf/ir-2018-00156.pdf; https://doaj.org/toc/1598-9100; https://doaj.org/toc/2288-1956 ) Array ( [Name] => DOI [Label] => DOI [Group] => ID [Data] => 10.5217/ir.2018.00156 ) Array ( [Name] => URL [Label] => Access URL [Group] => URL [Data] => <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://doaj.org/article/e6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430" linkWindow="_blank">https://doaj.org/article/e6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430</link> ) Array ( [Name] => AN [Label] => Accession Number [Group] => ID [Data] => edsdoj.6a7aed09efe48c9a01162827f8f9430 ) |
| RecordInfo |
Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => doi
[Value] => 10.5217/ir.2018.00156
)
)
[Languages] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Text] => English
)
)
[PhysicalDescription] => Array
(
[Pagination] => Array
(
[PageCount] => 6
[StartPage] => 413
)
)
[Subjects] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Colonoscopy
[Type] => general
)
[1] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Bowel preparation
[Type] => general
)
[2] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Oral sulfate solution
[Type] => general
)
[3] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate
[Type] => general
)
[4] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Medicine
[Type] => general
)
[5] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
[Type] => general
)
[6] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => RC799-869
[Type] => general
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study
[Type] => main
)
)
)
[BibRelationships] => Array
(
[HasContributorRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Jeeyeon Kim
)
)
)
[1] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Hyun Gun Kim
)
)
)
[2] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Kyeong Ok Kim
)
)
)
[3] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Hyung Wook Kim
)
)
)
[4] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Jongha Park
)
)
)
[5] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Jeong-Sik Byeon
)
)
)
[6] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Sung-Wook Hwang
)
)
)
[7] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Hyun Deok Shin
)
)
)
[8] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Jeong Eun Shin
)
)
)
[9] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Hyo-Joon Yang
)
)
)
[10] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Hyun Seok Lee
)
)
)
[11] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Yunho Jung
)
)
)
[12] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Young-Seok Cho
)
)
)
[13] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Young Eun Joo
)
)
)
[14] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Dae-Seong Myung
)
)
)
[15] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Kyu Chan Huh
)
)
)
[16] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Eu Mi Ahn
)
)
)
)
[IsPartOfRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Dates] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[D] => 01
[M] => 07
[Type] => published
[Y] => 2019
)
)
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => issn-print
[Value] => 15989100
)
[1] => Array
(
[Type] => issn-print
[Value] => 22881956
)
)
[Numbering] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => volume
[Value] => 17
)
[1] => Array
(
[Type] => issue
[Value] => 3
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => Intestinal Research
[Type] => main
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
| IllustrationInfo |