Academic Journal

Periprostatic Lidocaine Infiltration and/or Synthetic Opioid (Meperidine or Tramadol) Administration Have No Analgesic Benefit during Prostate Biopsy

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Periprostatic Lidocaine Infiltration and/or Synthetic Opioid (Meperidine or Tramadol) Administration Have No Analgesic Benefit during Prostate Biopsy
المؤلفون: Bozlu, Murat, Atıcı, Şebnem, Ulusoy, Ercüment, Canpolat, Bülent, Çayan, Selahittin, Akbay, Erdem, Schellhammer, Paul F., Oral, Uğur
المصدر: Urologia Internationalis ; volume 72, issue 4, page 308-311 ; ISSN 0042-1138 1423-0399
بيانات النشر: S. Karger AG
سنة النشر: 2004
الوصف: Objectives: To examine in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study the analgesic effect of periprostatic nerve block and/or intravenous synthetic opioid administration during a 12-core prostate biopsy. Patients and Methods: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive unilateral periprostatic lidocaine administration and/or intravenous synthetic opioid (meperidine or tramadol) administration. Placebo groups received sterile normal saline. Unilateral infiltration was performed and biopsy was begun on this side. The degree of pain was recorded using the visual analog scale/numeric analog scale (VAS/NAS) score before the procedure, during probe introduction into the rectum, during unilateral periprostatic nerve blockade, during the first 6-core biopsy and during the second 6-core biopsy, and 30 min after biopsy completion. Results: Most of the patients had mild or moderate pain (VAS/NAS <6) during the actual biopsy procedure. However, no significant differences existed between the groups with regard to the pain scores at any time (p > 0.05). Compared with pain scores, no significant differences existed between the first 6-core (blocked side) and second 6-core biopsies (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Periprostatic lidocaine infiltration and/or intravenous synthetic opioid analgesics are not beneficial in significantly reducing pain during biopsy. We think that most of the patients do have pain during biopsy, however the intensity of pain is tolerable and does not require analgesics.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1159/000077683
الاتاحة: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000077683
https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/77683
Rights: https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses ; https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.1BA53AC4
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
ResultId 1
Header edsbas
BASE
edsbas.1BA53AC4
763
3
Academic Journal
academicJournal
763.344360351563
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.1BA53AC4&custid=s6537998&authtype=sso
FullText Array ( [Availability] => 0 )
Array ( [0] => Array ( [Url] => http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000077683# [Name] => EDS - BASE [Category] => fullText [Text] => View record in BASE [MouseOverText] => View record in BASE ) )
Items Array ( [Name] => Title [Label] => Title [Group] => Ti [Data] => Periprostatic Lidocaine Infiltration and/or Synthetic Opioid (Meperidine or Tramadol) Administration Have No Analgesic Benefit during Prostate Biopsy )
Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Authors [Group] => Au [Data] => &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Bozlu%2C+Murat%22&quot;&gt;Bozlu, Murat&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Atıcı%2C+Şebnem%22&quot;&gt;Atıcı, Şebnem&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Ulusoy%2C+Erc&#252;ment%22&quot;&gt;Ulusoy, Erc&#252;ment&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Canpolat%2C+B&#252;lent%22&quot;&gt;Canpolat, B&#252;lent&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22&#199;ayan%2C+Selahittin%22&quot;&gt;&#199;ayan, Selahittin&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Akbay%2C+Erdem%22&quot;&gt;Akbay, Erdem&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Schellhammer%2C+Paul+F%2E%22&quot;&gt;Schellhammer, Paul F.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Oral%2C+Uğur%22&quot;&gt;Oral, Uğur&lt;/searchLink&gt; )
Array ( [Name] => TitleSource [Label] => Source [Group] => Src [Data] => Urologia Internationalis ; volume 72, issue 4, page 308-311 ; ISSN 0042-1138 1423-0399 )
Array ( [Name] => Publisher [Label] => Publisher Information [Group] => PubInfo [Data] => S. Karger AG )
Array ( [Name] => DatePubCY [Label] => Publication Year [Group] => Date [Data] => 2004 )
Array ( [Name] => Abstract [Label] => Description [Group] => Ab [Data] => Objectives: To examine in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study the analgesic effect of periprostatic nerve block and/or intravenous synthetic opioid administration during a 12-core prostate biopsy. Patients and Methods: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive unilateral periprostatic lidocaine administration and/or intravenous synthetic opioid (meperidine or tramadol) administration. Placebo groups received sterile normal saline. Unilateral infiltration was performed and biopsy was begun on this side. The degree of pain was recorded using the visual analog scale/numeric analog scale (VAS/NAS) score before the procedure, during probe introduction into the rectum, during unilateral periprostatic nerve blockade, during the first 6-core biopsy and during the second 6-core biopsy, and 30 min after biopsy completion. Results: Most of the patients had mild or moderate pain (VAS/NAS &lt;6) during the actual biopsy procedure. However, no significant differences existed between the groups with regard to the pain scores at any time (p &gt; 0.05). Compared with pain scores, no significant differences existed between the first 6-core (blocked side) and second 6-core biopsies (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusion: Periprostatic lidocaine infiltration and/or intravenous synthetic opioid analgesics are not beneficial in significantly reducing pain during biopsy. We think that most of the patients do have pain during biopsy, however the intensity of pain is tolerable and does not require analgesics. )
Array ( [Name] => TypeDocument [Label] => Document Type [Group] => TypDoc [Data] => article in journal/newspaper )
Array ( [Name] => Language [Label] => Language [Group] => Lang [Data] => English )
Array ( [Name] => DOI [Label] => DOI [Group] => ID [Data] => 10.1159/000077683 )
Array ( [Name] => URL [Label] => Availability [Group] => URL [Data] => http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000077683&lt;br /&gt;https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/77683 )
Array ( [Name] => Copyright [Label] => Rights [Group] => Cpyrght [Data] => https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses ; https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses )
Array ( [Name] => AN [Label] => Accession Number [Group] => ID [Data] => edsbas.1BA53AC4 )
RecordInfo Array ( [BibEntity] => Array ( [Identifiers] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Type] => doi [Value] => 10.1159/000077683 ) ) [Languages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Text] => English ) ) [Titles] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [TitleFull] => Periprostatic Lidocaine Infiltration and/or Synthetic Opioid (Meperidine or Tramadol) Administration Have No Analgesic Benefit during Prostate Biopsy [Type] => main ) ) ) [BibRelationships] => Array ( [HasContributorRelationships] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Bozlu, Murat ) ) ) [1] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Atıcı, Şebnem ) ) ) [2] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Ulusoy, Ercüment ) ) ) [3] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Canpolat, Bülent ) ) ) [4] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Çayan, Selahittin ) ) ) [5] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Akbay, Erdem ) ) ) [6] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Schellhammer, Paul F. ) ) ) [7] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Oral, Uğur ) ) ) ) [IsPartOfRelationships] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [BibEntity] => Array ( [Dates] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [D] => 01 [M] => 01 [Type] => published [Y] => 2004 ) ) [Identifiers] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Type] => issn-locals [Value] => edsbas ) ) [Titles] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [TitleFull] => Urologia Internationalis ; volume 72, issue 4, page 308-311 ; ISSN 0042-1138 1423-0399 [Type] => main ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IllustrationInfo