Academic Journal
WOMEN WORKERS: PROTECTION OR EQUALITY?
| العنوان: | WOMEN WORKERS: PROTECTION OR EQUALITY? |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Munts, Raymond, Rice, David G. |
| المصدر: | ILR Review. Oct70, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p3-13. 11p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | *WOMEN'S employment laws, *WOMEN employees, *LABOR laws, *INDUSTRIALIZATION, *OCCUPATIONS, LEGISLATIVE bills, WOMEN'S rights, CIVIL rights |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: | UNITED States |
| مستخلص: | The article discusses the issues involving the laws, which prohibit women from some occupations or limiting their hours of work as well as the stand of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission on such issues in the U.S. Before the World War I, states had started making laws that aimed at protecting workers which was considered to be a public achievement over unchecked industrialization. Since most of these laws only apply to women, governing their hours of work and conditions of employment, lawmakers are assessing protective law at urging of those who believe such legislation restricts women's access to jobs and places women at a disadvantage in competing with men. The banning of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 threatened women's protective law. |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Business Source Index |
| ResultId |
1 |
|---|---|
| Header |
bsx Business Source Index 4458592 1267 6 Academic Journal academicJournal 1266.96850585938 |
| PLink |
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=bsx&AN=4458592&custid=s6537998&authtype=sso |
| FullText |
Array
(
[Availability] => 0
)
|
| Items |
Array
(
[Name] => Title
[Label] => Title
[Group] => Ti
[Data] => WOMEN WORKERS: PROTECTION OR EQUALITY?
)
Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Authors [Group] => Au [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Munts%2C+Raymond%22">Munts, Raymond</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rice%2C+David+G%2E%22">Rice, David G.</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => TitleSource [Label] => Source [Group] => Src [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22ILR+Review%22">ILR Review</searchLink>. Oct70, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p3-13. 11p. ) Array ( [Name] => Subject [Label] => Subject Terms [Group] => Su [Data] => *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22WOMEN'S+employment+laws%22">WOMEN'S employment laws</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22WOMEN+employees%22">WOMEN employees</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22LABOR+laws%22">LABOR laws</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22INDUSTRIALIZATION%22">INDUSTRIALIZATION</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22OCCUPATIONS%22">OCCUPATIONS</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22LEGISLATIVE+bills%22">LEGISLATIVE bills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22WOMEN'S+rights%22">WOMEN'S rights</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CIVIL+rights%22">CIVIL rights</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => SubjectGeographic [Label] => Geographic Terms [Group] => Su [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22UNITED+States%22">UNITED States</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => Abstract [Label] => Abstract [Group] => Ab [Data] => The article discusses the issues involving the laws, which prohibit women from some occupations or limiting their hours of work as well as the stand of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission on such issues in the U.S. Before the World War I, states had started making laws that aimed at protecting workers which was considered to be a public achievement over unchecked industrialization. Since most of these laws only apply to women, governing their hours of work and conditions of employment, lawmakers are assessing protective law at urging of those who believe such legislation restricts women's access to jobs and places women at a disadvantage in competing with men. The banning of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 threatened women's protective law. ) |
| RecordInfo |
Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => doi
[Value] => 10.1177/001979397002400101
)
)
[Languages] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Code] => eng
[Text] => English
)
)
[PhysicalDescription] => Array
(
[Pagination] => Array
(
[PageCount] => 11
[StartPage] => 3
)
)
[Subjects] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => WOMEN'S employment laws
[Type] => general
)
[1] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => WOMEN employees
[Type] => general
)
[2] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => LABOR laws
[Type] => general
)
[3] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => INDUSTRIALIZATION
[Type] => general
)
[4] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => OCCUPATIONS
[Type] => general
)
[5] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => LEGISLATIVE bills
[Type] => general
)
[6] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => WOMEN'S rights
[Type] => general
)
[7] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => CIVIL rights
[Type] => general
)
[8] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => UNITED States
[Type] => general
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => WOMEN WORKERS: PROTECTION OR EQUALITY?
[Type] => main
)
)
)
[BibRelationships] => Array
(
[HasContributorRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Munts, Raymond
)
)
)
[1] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Rice, David G.
)
)
)
)
[IsPartOfRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Dates] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[D] => 01
[M] => 10
[Text] => Oct70
[Type] => published
[Y] => 1970
)
)
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => issn-print
[Value] => 00197939
)
)
[Numbering] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => volume
[Value] => 24
)
[1] => Array
(
[Type] => issue
[Value] => 1
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => ILR Review
[Type] => main
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
| IllustrationInfo |