التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Power production competition under different regulations: a social welfare perspective. |
| المؤلفون: |
Li, Guo1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Liu, Mengqi1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Li, Xiaochuan1,2,3 (AUTHOR) lxclingang@163.com, Li, Haifeng1,2,3 (AUTHOR) |
| المصدر: |
International Journal of Production Research. Dec2024, Vol. 62 Issue 24, p8970-8987. 18p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*ENVIRONMENTAL protection, *POWER resources, *RENEWABLE energy sources, RENEWABLE portfolio standards, PUBLIC welfare policy |
| مستخلص: |
With the prevalence of low-carbon transmission, traditional energy power generation enterprises (TGEs) are facing increasing pressure. By comparison, renewable energy power generation (REPG) holds the advantage of low carbon. To promote the development of REPG, various regulation policies have been implemented. This paper aims at investigating the interplays between renewable energy power generation enterprise (RGE) and TGE's production decisions under different regulation policies from the social welfare perspective. We consider the feed-in tariff (FIT), renewable portfolio standard (RPS), and carbon tax (CT) policies. Our analyses reveal several major findings. First, the influence of the regulation policy on RGE and TGE's power generation quantities depends on the gap between REPG cost and traditional energy power generation (TEPG) cost. Second, the regulator's optimal regulation policy hinges on his emphasis on the economic benefit and the environmental protection. Third, as the REPG cost decreases and the regulator's emphasis on environmental protection increases, the regulator's optimal policy from the social welfare perspective exhibits a trend of 'FIT-CT-RPS.' Fourth, TGE's preferred policy focuses on FIT or CT, and RGE's preferred policy is always RPS regardless of how the regulator's attention on environmental protection changes. On this basis, managerial implications for promoting REPG are provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of International Journal of Production Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Business Source Index |