-
1Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Almufarrij, Ibrahim, Dillon, Harvey, Munro, Kevin J.
المصدر: Almufarrij , I , Dillon , H & Munro , K J 2023 , ' Do we need audiogram-based prescriptions? a systematic review ' , International Journal of Audiology , vol. 62 , no. 6 , pp. 500-511 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2022.2064925
مصطلحات موضوعية: benefit, direct-to-consumer, hearing aids, over-the-counter, real-ear probe-microphone measures
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
2Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Mueller, HG
المصدر: GMS Zeitschrift für Audiologie - Audiological Acoustics; VOL: 2; DOC05 /20200610/
مصطلحات موضوعية: probe microphone measures, real ear measures, hearing aid verification, prescriptive hearing aid fittings, NAL-NL2, ddc: 610
Relation: Aazh H, Moore BC. The value of routine real ear measurement of the gain of digital hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 Sep;18(8):653-64. DOI:10.3766/jaaa.18.8.3; Aazh H, Moore BC, Prasher D. The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids. Am J Audiol. 2012 Dec;21(2):175-80. DOI:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/11-0008); American Academy of Audiology. Code of ethics. 2011. Available from: http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Pages/codeofethics.aspx; Amlani AM, Pumford J, Gessling E. Real-ear measurement and its impact on aided audibility and patient loyalty. Hear Rev. 2017;24(10):12-21.; British Society of Audiology. Guidance on the verification of hearing devices using probe microphone measurements. 2018. Available from https://www.thebsa.org.uk/resources/; Byrne D, Tonnison W. Selecting the gain of hearing aids for persons with sensorineural hearing impairment. Scand Audiol. 1976;5:51-9. DOI:10.3109/01050397609043095; Byrne D, Dillon H, Ching T, Katsch R, Keidser G. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 Jan;12(1):37-51.; Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear. 1986 Aug;7(4):257-65. DOI:10.1097/00003446-198608000-00007; Caswell-Midwinter B, Whitmer WM. Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises. Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216518820220. DOI:10.1177/2331216518820220; Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Mar;97(3):1854-64. DOI:10.1121/1.412980; Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995 Apr;16(2):176-86. DOI:10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005; Cox RM. Using loudness data for hearing aid selection: The IHAFF approach. Hear J. 1995;48(2):10, 39-44. DOI:10.1097/00025572-199502000-00001; Dillon H. The research of Denis Byrne at NAL: Implications for clinicians today. AudiologyOnline. 2001 Dec 24. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/research-denis-byrne-at-nal-1200; Folkeard P, Pumford J, Abbasalipour P, Willis N, Scollie S. A comparison of automated real-ear and traditional hearing aid fitting methods. Hear Rev. 2018;25(11):28-32.; Hawkins D, Cook J. Hearing aid software predictive gain values: How accurate are they? Hear J. 2003;56(7):26-34. DOI:10.1097/01.HJ.0000292552.60032.8b; Holube I. Getting to know the ISTS. AudiologyOnline. 2015 Feb 9. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/20q-getting-to-know-ists-13295; Holube I, Fredelake S, Vlaming M, Kollmeier B. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol. 2010 Dec;49(12):891-903. DOI:10.3109/14992027.2010.506889; International Society of Audiology. Good practice guidance for adult hearing aid fittings and services - Background to the document and consultation. 2005. Available from: https://www.isa-audiology.org/ members/pdf/GPG-ADAF.pdf; Johnson E. Same or different: Comparing the latest NAL and DSL prescriptive targets. AudiologyOnline. 2012 Apr 9. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/20q-same-or-different-comparing-769; Johnson EE, Dillon H. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):441-59. DOI:10.3766/jaaa.22.7.5; Keidser G, Dillon H. What's new in prescriptive fitting down under? In: Palmer C, Seewald R, editors. Hearing Care for Adults Conference 2006. Phonak AG; 2006. p. 133-42.; Keidser G, Alamudi K. Real-life efficacy and reliability of training a hearing aid. Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):619-29. DOI:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828d269a; Keidser G, Dillon H, Flax M, Ching T, Brewer S. The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure. Audiol Res. 2011 May;1(1):e24. DOI:10.4081/audiores.2011.e24; Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, Revit LJ, Banerjee S. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. DOI:10.1121/1.1784440; Leavitt R, Bentler R, Flexer C. Hearing aid programming practices in Oregon: fitting errors and real ear measurements. Hear Rev. 2017;24(6):30-3.; Leavitt R, Flexer C. The importance of audibility in successful amplification of hearing loss. Hear Rev. 2012;19(13):20-3.; Mueller HG. Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(7):448-60. DOI:10.3766/jaaa.16.7.5; Mueller HG, Ricketts TA, Bentler RA. Speech Mapping and Probe Microphone Measures. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2017.; Mueller HG. Is autoREMfit a reasonable verification alternative? AudiologyOnline. 2019. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/; Mueller HG, Hornsby BW, Weber JE. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;19(10):758-73. DOI:10.3766/jaaa.19.10.4; Mueller HG, Ricketts TA. Open-canal fittings: Ten take-home tips. Hear J. 2006;59(11):24-39. DOI:10.1097/01.HJ.0000286216.61469.eb; Mueller HG, Ricketts TA. Hearing aid verification: Will autoREMfit move the sticks? AudiologyOnline. 2018 Jul 9. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/20q-hearing-aid-verification-226-23532; Mueller HG, Hornsby BWY. Trainable hearing aids: the influence of previous use-gain. AudiologyOnline. 2014 Jul 14. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/trainable-hearing-aids-the-influence--12764; Mueller HG. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress. Trends Amplif. 2001 Jun;5(2):35-68. DOI:10.1177/108471380100500202; Palmer C. Best practice: It's a matter of ethics. Audiology Today. 2009;21(5):31-5.; Palmer C. Implementing a gain learning feature. AudiologyOnline. 2012 Aug 8. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/siemens-expert-series-implementing-gain-11244; Pearsons K, Bennett R, Fidel S. Speech levels in various noise environments. Report No. EPA-600/1-77-025. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1977.; Sabin AT, Van Tasell DJ, Rabinowitz B, Dhar S. Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids. Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216519900589. DOI:10.1177/2331216519900589; Sanders J, Stoody T, Weber J, Mueller HG. Manufacturers' NAL-NL2 fittings fail real-ear verification. Hear Rev. 2015; 21(3):24.; Schwartz D, Walden B, Mueller H, Surr R. Clinical experience with probe-microphone measurements. In: Conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA); 1980; Detroit, Michigan.; Valente M, Oeding K, Brockmeyer A, Smith S, Kallogjeri D. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Sep;29(8):706-21. DOI:10.3766/jaaa.17005; http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zaud000009; http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0183-zaud0000096; http://www.egms.de/en/journals/zaud/2020-2/zaud000009.shtml