يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 73 نتيجة بحث عن '"preprint servers"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.63s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Science Editor and Publisher; Online First ; Научный редактор и издатель; Online First ; 2541-8122 ; 2542-0267

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/402/256; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/402/257; Teixeira da Silva J. A., Huang C.-K. K., Nazarovets M. Publishing embargoes and versions of preprints: impact on the dissemination of information. Open Information Science. 2024;8(1):20240002. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2024-0002; Sarabipour S., Debat H. J., Emmott E., Burgess S. J., Schwessinger B., Hensel Z. On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective. PLoS Biology. 2019;17(2):e3000151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151; Lin J., Yu Y., Zhou Y., Zhou Z., Shi X. How many preprints have actually been printed and why: A case study of computer science preprints on arXiv. Scientometrics. 2020;124(1):555–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03430-8; Moshontz H., Binion G., Walton H., Brown B. T., Syed M. A guide to posting and managing preprints. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2021;4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211019948; Franco Iborra S., Polka J., Puebla I. Promoting constructive feedback on preprints with the FAST principles. eLife. 2022;11:e78424. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78424; Glymour M. M., Charpignon M.-L., Chen Y.-H., Kiang M. V. Preprints and the future of scientific publishing: In favor of relevance. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2023;192(7):1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad052; Soderberg C. K., Errington T. M., Nosek B. A. Credibility of preprints: An interdisciplinary survey of researchers. Royal Society Open Science. 2020;7(10):201520. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201520; Wang Z., Glänzel W., Chen Y. The impact of preprints in library and information science: An analysis of citations, usage and social attention indicators. Scientometrics. 2020;125(2):1403–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03612-4; Xu F., Ou G., Ma T., Wang X. The consistency of impact of preprints and their journal publications. Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(2):101153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101153; Fraser N., Mayr P., Peters I. Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(11):e0274441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274441; Teixeira da Silva J. A. Do peer-reviewed papers with a preprint version have an unfair metrics advantage? Journal of Food Science. 2023;88(7):2738–2739. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16707; Ni R., Waltman L. To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2024;75(6):749–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24880; Teixeira da Silva J. A., Dobránszki J. Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2019;45(2):162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.009; Klebel T., Reichmann S., Polka J., McDowell G., Penfold N., Hindle S., Ross-Hellauer T. Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0239518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239518; Malički M., Jerončić A., Ter Riet G., Bouter L. M., Ioannidis J. P. A., Goodman S. N., Aalbersberg I. J. Preprint servers’ policies, submission requirements, and transparency in reporting and research integrity recommendations. JAMA. 2020;324(18):1901–1903. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17195; Penfold N. C., Polka J. K. Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences. PLoS Genetics. 2020;16(4):e1008565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008565; Teixeira da Silva J. A., Nazarovets S. Current ethics policies in 36 preprint servers: Relevance for academic medicine. Academic Medicine. 2024;99(2):129–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005507; Teixeira da Silva J. A., Nazarovets S. Most preprint servers allow the publication of opinion papers. Open Information Science. 2023;7(1):20220144. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0144; Teixeira da Silva J. A. Anonymity in anonymized peer review is incompatible with preprints. European Science Editing. 2022;48:e91290. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e91290; Blatch-Jones A. J., Recio Saucedo A., Giddins B. The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(9):e0291627. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291627; Teixeira da Silva J. A. Intellectual phishing, hidden conflicts of interest and hidden data: new risks of preprints. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education. 2017;4(3):136–146. Available at: https://kadint.net/journals_n/1516278592.pdf (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Teixeira da Silva J. A. Preprints: ethical hazard or academic liberation? KOME. 2017;5(2):73–80. https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2017.26; Teixeira da Silva J. A. The preprint wars. AME Medical Journal. 2017;2:74. https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2017.05.23; COS. Product roadmap. 2024. Available at: https://www.cos.io/products/product-roadmap (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Nosek B. A., Shaw L. C., Errington T. M., Pfeiffer N., Mellor D. T., Brooks R. E., III, Rice A., Litherland D. M. Center for Open Science: Strategic Plan (version 3). 2022. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/x2w9h; COS. Mission. 2024. Available at: https://www.cos.io/about/mission (accessed: 10.05.2024).; APA. APA Journals Program Collaborates with Center for Open Science to Advance Open Science Practices in Psychological Research. 2017. Available at: https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/08/open-science (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Narock T., Goldstein E. B. Quantifying the growth of preprint services hosted by the Center for Open Science. Publications. 2019;7(2):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020044; COS. The TOP Guidelines. 2024. Available at: https://www.cos.io/initiatives/top-guidelines (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Mallapaty S. Popular preprint servers face closure because of money troubles. Nature. 2020;578(7795):349. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00363-3; COS. OSF Preprints. 2024. Available at: https://www.cos.io/products/osf-preprints (accessed: 10.05.2024).; COS. Finances. 2024. Available at: https://www.cos.io/about/finances (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Teixeira da Silva J. A. The preprint debate: what are the issues? Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2018;74(2):162–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.002; COS. Six New Preprint Services Join a Growing Community Across Disciplines to Accelerate Scholarly Communication. 2017. Available at: https://www.cos.io/about/news/six-new-preprint-services-join-growing-community-across-disciplines-accelerate-scholarly-communication (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Smart P. The evolution, benefits, and challenges of preprints and their interaction with journals. Science Editing. 2022;9(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.269; Teixeira da Silva J. A. Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers be assigned equal status? Journal of Visceral Surgery. 2022;159(5):444–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.08.002; COS. Withdrawing a Preprint. 2024. Available at: https://help.osf.io/article/186-withdrawing-a-preprint (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Teixeira da Silva J. A. Silent or stealth retractions, the dangerous voices of the unknown, deleted literature. Publishing Research Quarterly. 2016;32(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-015-9439-y; Mai N. C. Mathematical model of retractions: Facts, analysis and recommendations. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/r7kan (“silent retraction”, date unknown); Pourret O., Irawan D. E., Tennant J. P. On the potential of preprints in geochemistry: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Sustainability. 2020;12(8):3360. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083360; Penfold N. Lack of sustainability plans for preprint services risks their potential to improve science. 2023. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/03/02/lack-of-sustainability-plans-for-preprint-services-risks-their-potential-to-improve-science/ (accessed: 10.05.2024).; Ikeda A., Yonemitsu F., Yoshimura N., Sasaki K., Yamada Y. The Open Science Foundation clandestinely abused for malicious activities. PsyArXiv (preprint, not peer-reviewed; version 4: 7 January 2024). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xtuen; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/402

  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
    Academic Journal
  16. 16
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona

    المصدر: mBio

    Relation: Alwine JC, Enquist LW, Dermody TS, Goodrum F. 2021. What is the price of science? mBio 12:e00117-21.; http://hdl.handle.net/10150/659797; mBio

  17. 17
  18. 18
    Academic Journal
  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20
    Academic Journal