-
1Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Zhang, Jiangbo, Zhao, Yiyi
مصطلحات موضوعية: keyword:bounded confidence, keyword:probability bounds, keyword:order statistics, msc:62G30, msc:91D30
وصف الملف: application/pdf
Relation: mr:MR4600377; reference:[1] Altafini, C.: Dynamics of opinion forming in structurally balanced social networks.Plos One 7 (2012), 6, e38135.; reference:[2] Blondel, V. D., Hendrickx, J. M., Tsitsiklis, J. N.: On Krause's multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity.In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2009. MR 2571922; reference:[3] Boyd, S., Ghosh, A., Prabhakar, B., Shah, D.: Randomized gossip algorithms.IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 (2006), 6, 2508-2530. Zbl 1283.94005, MR 2238556; reference:[4] David, E., Kleinberg, J.: Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World.Cambridge University Press, New York 2010.; reference:[5] Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents.Adv. Compl. Syst. 3 (2000), 87-98.; reference:[6] Degroot, M. H.: Reaching a consensus.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69 (1974), 345, 118-121.; reference:[7] Durrett, R.: Probability Theory: Theory and Examples (Fourth edition).Cambridge University Press, New York 2010. MR 2722836; reference:[8] Hatano, Y., Mesbahi, M.: Agreement over random networks.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 50 (2005), 11, 1867-1872. MR 2182742; reference:[9] Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis and simulation.J. Artific. Soc. Social Simul. (JASSS) 5 (2002), 3.; reference:[10] Liu, J., Chen, X., Basar, T., Belabbas, M. A.: Exponential convergence of the discrete-time altafini model.Preprint, arXiv [math.OC]:1512.0715, 2015.; reference:[11] Marvel, S. A., Kleinberg, J., Kleinberg, R. D., Strogatz, S. H.: Continuous-time model of structural balance.Proc. National Academy of Sciences 108 (2011), 5, 1751-1752.; reference:[12] Peng, Y., Zhao, Y., Hu, J.: On the role of community structure in evolution of opinion formation: A new bounded confidence opinion dynamics.Inform. Sci. 621 (2023), 672-690.; reference:[13] Qualman, E.: Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business.; reference:[14] Zhang, J., Hong, Y., Hu, X.: Multi-agent opinion dynamics of bounded confidence with non-local aggregative interaction.SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 (2017), 4, 2543-2573. MR 3686786; reference:[15] Zhao, Y., Xu, M., Dong, Y., Peng, Y.: Fuzzy inference based Hegselmann-Krause opinion dynamics for group decision-making under ambiguity.Inform. Process. Management 58 (2021), 5, 102671.
-
2Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Chen, Zihan, Xing, Yu, Qin, Huashu
مصطلحات موضوعية: keyword:opinion dynamics, keyword:individual susceptibility, keyword:anchoring effect, keyword:steady-state behavior, msc:91C99, msc:91D30, msc:91E99
وصف الملف: application/pdf
Relation: mr:MR4043544; zbl:Zbl 07177912; reference:[1] Acemoğlu, D., Como, G., Fagnani, F., Ozdaglar, A.: Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks.Math. Oper. Res. 38 (2013), 1-27. MR 3029476, 10.1287/moor.1120.0570; reference:[2] Bindel, D., Kleinberg, J., Oren, S.: How bad is forming your own opinion.Games Econ. Behav. (2015), 248-265. MR 3377660, 10.1016/j.geb.2014.06.004; reference:[3] Castellano, C., Castellano, F., Vittorio, L.: Statistical physics of social dynamics.Rev. Mod. Phys. 8 (2009), 2, 591-646. 10.1103/revmodphys.81.591; reference:[4] Chen, Z., Qin, J., Li, B., Qi, H., Buchhorn, P., Shi, G.: Dynamics of opinions with social biases.Automatica 106 (2019), 374-383. MR 3954046, 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.04.035; reference:[5] Dandekar, P., Goel, A., Lee, D. T.: Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 5791-5796. MR 3065807, 10.1073/pnas.1217220110; reference:[6] DeGroot, M. H.: Reaching a consensus.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69 (1974), 118-121. 10.1080/01621459.1974.10480137; reference:[7] DeMarzo, P. M., Vayanos, D., Zwiebel, J.: Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions.Q. J. Econ. 118 (2003), 909-968. 10.1162/00335530360698469; reference:[8] Flache, A., Mäs, M., Feliciani, T., Chattoe-Brown, E., Deffuant, G., Huet, S., Lorenz, J.: Models of social influence: Towards the next frontiers.JASSS 20 (2017), 4. 10.18564/jasss.3521; reference:[9] Friedkin, N. E., Johnsen, E. C.: Social influence and opinions.J. Math. Sociol. 15 (1990), 193-206. 10.1080/0022250x.1990.9990069; reference:[10] Friedkin, N. E., Proskurnikov, A. V., Tempo, R., Parsegov, S. E.: Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints.Science 354 (2016), 321-326. MR 3561171, 10.1126/science.aag2624; reference:[11] Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation.JASSS 5 (2002).; reference:[12] Helbing, D.: Quantitative Sociodynamics: Stochastic Methods and Models of Social Interaction Processes.Springer Science and Business Media, 2010. MR 2848027; reference:[13] Kacperski, K.: Opinion formation model with strong leader and external impact: a mean field approach.Physica A 269 (1999), 511-526. 10.1016/s0378-4371(99)00174-0; reference:[14] Kramer, G. H.: Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior, 1896 - 1964.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 65 (1971), 131-143. 10.2307/1955049; reference:[15] Lawrence, E., Farrell, J., Farrell, H.: Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics.Perspect. Polit. 8 (2010), 141-157. 10.1017/s1537592709992714; reference:[16] Li, L., Scaglione, A., Swami, A., Zhao, Q.: Consensus, polarization and clustering of opinions in social networks.IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 31 (2013), 1072-1083. 10.1109/jsac.2013.130609; reference:[17] Myers, D. G.: Social Psychology.McGraw-Hill, New York 1993.; reference:[18] Proskurnikov, A. V., Tempo, R.: A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I.Ann. Rev. Control 43 (2017), 65-79. MR 3880766, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002; reference:[19] Scott, J.: Social Network Analysis.Sage, 2017. 10.4135/9781483381411.n575; reference:[20] Shi, G., Proutiere, A., Johansson, M., Baras, J. S., Johansson, K. H.: The evolution of beliefs over signed social networks.Oper. Res. 64 (2016), 585-604. MR 3515199, 10.1287/opre.2015.1448; reference:[21] Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.J. Risk Uncertain. 5 (1992), 297-323. 10.1007/bf00122574; reference:[22] Xing, Y., Hong, Y., Fang, H.: A Novel Opinion Model for Complex Macro-Behaviors of Mass Opinion.Sci. China-Inf. Sci.; reference:[23] Yildiz, E., Ozdaglar, A., Acemoglu, D., Saberi, A., Scaglione, A.: Binary opinion dynamics with stubborn agents.ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 1 (2013), 4, 1-30. 10.1145/2538508; reference:[24] Zhang, J.: Convergence analysis for asymmetric Deffuant-Weisbuch model.Kybernetika 50 (2014), 32-45. MR 3195003, 10.14736/kyb-2014-1-0032; reference:[25] Zhang, J., Hong, Y., Hu, X.: Multiagent opinion dynamics of bounded confidence with nonlocal aggregative interaction.SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 (2017), 2543-2573. MR 3686786, 10.1137/16m1083268
-
3
المؤلفون: Jürgen Lerner, Ulrik Brandes, Uwe Nagel
المصدر: Advances in Data Analysis and Classification. 5:81-94
مصطلحات موضوعية: Statistics and Probability, Fuzzy clustering, Feature vector, Correlation clustering, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, Clustering, Social network analysis, 010104 statistics & probability, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 0101 mathematics, Cluster analysis, Mathematics, msc:91D30, business.industry, Applied Mathematics, Network ensembles, Pattern recognition, msc:62H30, Graph, Computer Science Applications, Vertex (geometry), 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing, Artificial intelligence, ddc:004, business, Acculturation, MathematicsofComputing_DISCRETEMATHEMATICS, Curse of dimensionality
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
4Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Zhang, Jiangbo
مصطلحات موضوعية: keyword:opinion dynamics, keyword:asymmetric Deffuant–Weisbuch model, keyword:convergence, keyword:separation time, msc:60G40, msc:60H30, msc:91C99, msc:91D10, msc:91D30
وصف الملف: application/pdf
Relation: mr:MR3195003; zbl:Zbl 1291.91183; reference:[1] Boyd, S., Ghosh, A., Prabhakar, B., Shah, D.: Randomized gossip algorithms.Trans. Inform. Theory 52 (2006), 2508-2530. Zbl 1283.94005, MR 2238556, 10.1109/TIT.2006.874516; reference:[2] Chow, Y., Teicher, H.: Probability Theory: Independence Interchangeability Martingales. Second edition.Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg - Berlin 1978. MR 0513230; reference:[3] Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents.Adv. in Complex Systems 3 (2000), 87-98.; reference:[4] Godsil, C., Royle, G.: Algebraic Graph Theory.Springer-Verlag, New York 2001. Zbl 0968.05002, MR 1829620; reference:[5] Groeber, P., Schweitzer, F., Press, K.: How groups can foster consensus: The case of local cultures.J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulations 12 (2009), 2/4.; reference:[6] Harary, F.: A criterion for unanimity in French's theory of social power.In: Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor 1959, pp. 168-182.; reference:[7] Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models. Analysis and Simulation.J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulations 5 (2002), 3.; reference:[8] Hong, Y., Gao, L., Cheng, D., Hu, J.: Lyapuov-based approach to multi-agent systems with switching jointly connected interconnection.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 52 (2007), 943-948. MR 2324260, 10.1109/TAC.2007.895860; reference:[9] Hu, J.: On robust consensus of multi-agent systems with communication delays.Kybernetika 45 (2009), 768-784. Zbl 1190.93003, MR 2599111; reference:[10] Jiang, L., Hua, D., Zhu, J., Wang, B., Zhou., T.: Opinion dynamics on directed small-world networks.The European Physical Journal B 65 (2008), 2, 251-255. 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00342-3; reference:[11] Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A Survey.Internat. J. of Modern Physics C 18 (2007), 12, 1819-1838. Zbl 1151.91076, 10.1142/S0129183107011789; reference:[12] Lou, Y., Hong, Y.: Target containment control of multi-agent systems with random switching interconnection topologies.Automatica 48 (2012), 5, 879-885. Zbl 1246.93104, MR 2912813, 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.02.032; reference:[13] Serge, M., Marisa, Z.: The group as a polarizer of attitudes.J. Personal. Soc. Psychology 12 (1969), 1, 125-135. 10.1037/h0027568; reference:[14] Shi, G., Hong, Y.: Global target aggregation and state agreement of nonlinear multi-agent systems with switching topologies.Automatica 45 (2009), 1165-1175. Zbl 1162.93308, MR 2531590, 10.1016/j.automatica.2008.12.015; reference:[15] Thunberg, J., Song, W., Hong, Y., Hu, X.: Distributed attitude synchronization using backstepping and sliding mode control.Journal of Control Theory and Applications 12 (2014), 1, 48-55. MR 3152182; reference:[16] Touri, B.: Product of Random Stochastic Matrices And Distributed Averaging.Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Industrial Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011. Zbl 1244.15023; reference:[17] Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.: Meet, discuss and segregate!.Complexity 7 (2002), 3, 55-63. 10.1002/cplx.10031; reference:[18] Zhang, J., Hong, Y.: Opinion evolution analysis for short-range and long-range Deffuant-Weisbuch models.Physica A 392 (2013), 5289-5297. MR 3102806, 10.1016/j.physa.2013.07.014
-
5
المؤلفون: Fleischer, Daniel
مصطلحات موضوعية: wireless networks, Graphenzeichnen [gnd], social networks, msc:91D30, msc:31C05, msc:05C50, potential theory, graph drawing, msc:31C20, msc:05C85, Dirichlet-Problem [gnd], Potenzial [gnd], Soziales Netzwerk [gnd], Drahtloses Sensorsystem [gnd], Graphentheorie [gnd], ddc:004, Graph algorithms, Dirichlet problem, Algorithmus [gnd]
وصف الملف: application/pdf