-
1Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Jonathan Kilpelä, Jenna Hiltunen, Markus Hähkiöniemi, Kaisa Jokiranta, Sami Lehesvuori, Pasi Nieminen, Jouni Viiri
المصدر: Dialogic Pedagogy, Vol 11, Iss 3 (2023)
مصطلحات موضوعية: argumentation, dialogic argumentation, science education, teacher questioning, whole class discussion, Education (General), L7-991
وصف الملف: electronic resource
-
2Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Iwuanyanwu, Paul Nnanyereugo
مصطلحات موضوعية: Dialogic argumentation, Traditional instruction, Students, Physics, Problemsolving
وصف الملف: application/pdf
Relation: Iwuanyanwu, P.N. 2023. When Science Is Taught This Way, Students Become Critical Friends: Setting The Stage For Student Teachers. Research in Science Education (2023) 53:1063–1079 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10122-9]; http://hdl.handle.net/10394/42659
الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/10394/42659
-
3Book
المؤلفون: Hähkiöniemi, Markus
المساهمون: Bieda, Kristen N., Conner, AnnaMarie, Kosko, Karl W., Staples, Megan
مصطلحات موضوعية: argumentation, communicative approach, dialogic argumentation, dialogue, interaction, mathematics education, teacher support, opetuskeskustelu, argumentointi, dialogisuus, lukio, opettajat, matematiikka
وصف الملف: application/pdf; 145-158; fulltext
Relation: Conceptions and Consequences of Mathematical Argumentation, Justification, and Proof; Research in Mathematics Education; 286576; Research Council of Finland; Suomen Akatemia; CONVID_117403166
-
4Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Hasnunidah, Neni, Susilo, Herawati, Irawati, Mimien H., Suwono, Hadi
المصدر: Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran; Vol 6, No 2 (2022); 189-199 ; 2580-5533 ; 2580-5525 ; 10.21831/jk.v6i2
مصطلحات موضوعية: argument-driven inquiry, argumentation quality, dialogic argumentation, epistemic, scaffolding
وصف الملف: application/pdf
Relation: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/48183/pdf; https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/downloadSuppFile/48183/11411; https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/downloadSuppFile/48183/11412; https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/48183
-
5Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Hähkiöniemi, Markus, Hiltunen, Jenna, Jokiranta, Kaisa, Kilpelä, Jonathan, Lehesvuori, Sami, Nieminen, Pasi
مصطلحات موضوعية: Dialogic argumentation, Dialogic interactions, argumentointi, dialogisuus, fysiikka, opetuskeskustelu, matematiikka, yläkoululaiset
وصف الملف: application/pdf; fulltext
Relation: Learning, Culture and Social Interaction; 33; 286576; Research Council of Finland; Suomen Akatemia; Hähkiöniemi, M., Hiltunen, J., Jokiranta, K., Kilpelä, J., Lehesvuori, S., & Nieminen, P. (2022). Students' dialogic and justifying moves during dialogic argumentation in mathematics and physics. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction , 33 , Article 100608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100608; CONVID_104297092
-
6Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Švaříček, Roman
مصطلحات موضوعية: epistemic thinking, dialogic argumentation, case study, Educational Sciences
وصف الملف: text/pdf
-
7Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Chadha, Anita, Van Vechten, Renee
المصدر: Our House Articles, Posters, and Presentations
مصطلحات موضوعية: Argumentation, Online deliberation, Online teaching, Dialogic argumentation, Computer-mediated communication, Community-Based Learning, Education, Political Science, Politics and Social Change
وصف الملف: application/pdf
Relation: https://inspire.redlands.edu/oh_articles/191; https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/965
-
8Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Lehesvuori, Sami, Hähkiöniemi, Markus, Jokiranta, Kaisa, Nieminen, Pasi, Hiltunen, Jenna, Viiri, Jouni
مصطلحات موضوعية: dialogic argumentation, professional development, mathematics and science education, Educational Sciences
وصف الملف: text/pdf
-
9
المؤلفون: Markus Hähkiöniemi
المساهمون: Bieda, Kristen N., Conner, AnnaMarie, Kosko, Karl W., Staples, Megan
المصدر: Research in Mathematics Education ISBN: 9783030800079
مصطلحات موضوعية: dialogue, teacher support, dialogic argumentation, matematiikka, opetuskeskustelu, interaction, lukio, communicative approach, mathematics education, opettajat, argumentation, dialogisuus, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, argumentointi
وصف الملف: application/pdf; fulltext
-
10
المؤلفون: Markus Hähkiöniemi, Jenna Hiltunen, Kaisa Jokiranta, Jonathan Kilpelä, Sami Lehesvuori, Pasi Nieminen
مصطلحات موضوعية: matematiikka, dialogisuus, yläkoululaiset, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, opetuskeskustelu, argumentointi, Dialogic argumentation, Dialogic interactions, fysiikka, Education
وصف الملف: application/pdf; fulltext
-
11Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Pérez Pérez, Sandra, Crespo Allende, Nina María
المصدر: Alpha: revista de artes, letras y filosofía, ISSN 0716-4254, Nº. 52, 2021, pags. 91-110
مصطلحات موضوعية: argumentación dialógica infantil, estructura argumentativa, loci, Children’s dialogic argumentation, argumentative structure
وصف الملف: application/pdf
Relation: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8273482; (Revista) ISSN 0716-4254
-
12
المؤلفون: Švaříček, Roman
مصطلحات موضوعية: epistemic thinking, dialogic argumentation, case study
Relation: Studia paedagogica; [1] Alexander, R. J. (2008). Essays on pedagogy . London: Routledge. Berlin.; [2] Alexander, R.J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk . Cambridge: Dialogos.; [3] Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories . Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164–187. %7C DOI 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458; [4] Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering Personal Epistemology as Metacognition: A Multifaceted Approach to the Analysis of Epistemic Thinking . Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13–35. %7C DOI 10.1080/00461520.2013.863265; [5] Bendixen, L. D. (2002). A process model of epistemic belief change . In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 191–208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.; [6] Bendixen, L. D., Schraw, G., & Dunkle, M. E. (1998). Epistemic beliefs and moral reasoning . The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132(2), 187–200. %7C DOI 10.1080/00223989809599158; [7] Bendixen, L.D. & Feucht, F. C. (2010). (Eds.). Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.; [8] Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation . Science Education, 95, 191–216. %7C DOI 10.1002/sce.20420; [9] Billings, L., & Fitzgerald, J. (2002). Dialogic discussion and the Paideia seminar . American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 907–941. %7C DOI 10.3102/00028312039004905; [10] Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition . Metacognition and Learning, 5, 7–26. %7C DOI 10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5; [11] Bruner, J. (1978) The role of dialogue in language acquisition . In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella & W. J. Levell (Eds). The child's conception of language, (pp. 241–256). New York: Springer-Verlag.; [12] Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy: A Review of Argument Interventions in K-12 Science Contexts . Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371. %7C DOI 10.3102/0034654310376953; [13] Chinn, C. A., O'donnell, A. M., & Jinks, T. S. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning . The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77–97. %7C DOI 10.1080/00220970009600650; [14] Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition . In D. Rapp and J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.; [15] Cohen, D.K. (1990). A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329. %7C DOI 10.3102/01623737012003311; [16] Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory . Thousand Oaks: Sage.; [17] Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies . Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.005; [18] Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education . Studies in Science Education, 38, 39–72. %7C DOI 10.1080/03057260208560187; [19] Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus dispute: the impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom . Informal Logic, 29, 417–446. %7C DOI 10.22329/il.v29i4.2907; [20] Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., Villarroel, C., & Gilabert, S. (2015). Arguing collaboratively: argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 372–386. %7C DOI 10.1111/bjep.12078; [21] Feucht, F. C. (2011). The epistemic underpinnings of Mrs. M's reading lesson on drawing conclusions: a classroom-based research study . In J. Lunn Brownlee, G. Schraw, & D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Personal epistemology and teacher education (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Routledge.; [22] Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses . New York: Routledge.; [23] Gronostay, D. (2016). Argument, counterargument, and integration? Patterns of argument reappraisal in controversial classroom discussions . Journal of Social Science Education, 15(2), 42–56.; [24] Gronostay, D. (2018). To argue or not to argue? The role of personality traits, argumentativeness, epistemological beliefs and assigned positions for students' participation in controversial political classroom discussions . Unterrichtswiss, 6, 1–19.; [25] Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. R. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn . Abingdon, New York: Routledge.; [26] Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom. The democratic power of discussion . New York, NY: Routledge.; [27] Hofer, B. (2004). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 129–163. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.002; [28] Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning . Review of Educational Research, 67(1): 88–140. %7C DOI 10.3102/00346543067001088; [29] Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.; [30] Kuhn, D. (1999). Metacognitive development . In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 259–286). Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press.; [31] Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.; [32] Kuhn, D. (2009). Adolescent thinking . In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Individual bases of adolescent development (p. 152–186). John Wiley & Sons Inc.; [33] Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument . Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. %7C DOI 10.1002/sce.20395; [34] Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument . Thinking and Reasoning, 13(2), 90–104. %7C DOI 10.1080/13546780600625447; [35] Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.; [36] Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding . Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. %7C DOI 10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7; [37] Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentative competence . Cognition & Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. %7C DOI 10.1080/07370008.2013.830618; [38] Kuhn, T. (1968). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . University of Chicago Press, Chicago.; [39] Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.; [40] Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation//. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; [41] Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2014). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue . London: Routledge.; [42] Leitão, S. (2000). The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building . Human Development, 43(6), 332–360. %7C DOI 10.1159/000022695; [43] Mason, L. (1996). An analysis of children's construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions . Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 411–414. %7C DOI 10.1080/0951839960090404; [44] Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding . Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007; [45] Mason, L., Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of epistemological understandingand interest in interpreting a controversyand in topic-specific belief change . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 103–128. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.001; [46] Matusov, E. (2011). Authorial teaching and learning . In E. J. White &M. Peters (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 21–46). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.; [47] Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping Concepts of Agency in Educational Contexts . Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446. %7C DOI 10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0; [48] McNeill, K.L., Pimentel, D.S. & Strauss, E.G. (2013). The Impact of High School Science Teachers' Beliefs, Curricular Enactments and Experience on Student Learning During an Inquiry-based Urban Ecology Curriculum . International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2608–2644. %7C DOI 10.1080/09500693.2011.618193; [49] Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reason well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels . Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139–178. %7C DOI 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1; [50] Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach . New York, NY: Routledge.; [51] Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning . Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190. %7C DOI 10.1080/00461520701416306; [52] Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domainspecificity in personal epistemology research: philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework . Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–54. %7C DOI 10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6; [53] Muis, Krista R., Duffy, Melisa C. (2013). Epistemic Climate and Epistemic Change: Instruction Designed to Change Students' Beliefs and Learning Strategies and Improve Achievement . Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213–225. %7C DOI 10.1037/a0029690; [54] Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What's the use of'triadic dialogue'?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction . Applied linguistics, 21(3), 376–406. %7C DOI 10.1093/applin/21.3.376; [55] Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science . International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576. %7C DOI 10.1080/095006999290570; [56] Nokes, J. D. (2014). Elementary Students' Roles and Epistemic Stances During DocumentBased History Lessons . Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(3), 375–413. %7C DOI 10.1080/00933104.2014.937546; [57] Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 947–968. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.3660310909; [58] Nussbaum, E.M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: the role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 573–595. %7C DOI 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00062-0; [59] Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue. Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom . New York: Teachers College Press.; [60] Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme . New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.; [61] Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education . Review of Educational Research, 83,483–520.; [62] Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archoudidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument . Discourse Processes, 32, 155–175. Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L. J., Clark, A. M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., &; [63] NguyenJahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions . Cambridge journal of education, 39(1), 29–48. %7C DOI 10.1080/03057640802701952; [64] Sadler, T., & Fowler, S. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation . Science Education, 90, 986–1004. %7C DOI 10.1002/sce.20165; [65] Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension . Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. %7C DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498; [66] Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students . Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406–411. %7C DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.406; [67] Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study . Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 37–40. %7C DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.37; [68] Schwarz, R. (2005). Using facilitative skills in different roles . In R. Schwarz & A. Davidson (Eds.), The skilled facilitator fieldbook: Tips, tools, and tested methods for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches (pp. 27–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.; [69] Sedlacek, M., & Sedova, K. (2017). How many are talking? The role of collectivity in dialogic teaching . International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 99–108. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001; [70] Sedova, K. (2017). A case study of a transition to dialogic teaching as a process of gradual change . Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 278–290. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.018; [71] Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk . Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14–25. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005; [72] Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement . Learning and Instruction, 63. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217; [73] Sedova, K., Svaricek, R., Sedlacek, M., & Salamounova, Z. (2016). Jak se učitelé učí: Cestou profesního rozvoje k dialogickému vyučování . Brno: Masarykova univerzita.; [74] Sfard, A. (2016). Ritual for ritual, exploration for exploration or What the learners get is what you get from them in return . In J. Adler & A. Sfard (Eds.), Research for educational change: Transforming researchers' insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 53–75). London: Routledge.; [75] Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students'argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis . International Journal of Science Education, 23, 903–927. %7C DOI 10.1080/09500690010016076; [76] Snell, J. (2011). Interrogating video data: Systematic quantitative analysis versus microethnographic analysis . International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 253–258. %7C DOI 10.1080/13645579.2011.563624; [77] Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430–456. %7C DOI 10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5; [78] Svaricek, R., & Sedova, K. (2012). Feedback in educational communication in Czech secondary schools. Educational Assessment , Evaluation and Accountability, 24(3), 239–261.; [79] Toulmin, S. E. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts . Princeton: Princeton University Press.; [80] van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation . Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.; [81] Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977.; [82] von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.20213; [83] Vygotsky, L. (1970). Thought and Language . Cambridge: MIT Press.; [84] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.; [85] Walton, D. N. (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking . Argumentation, 3, 169–184. %7C DOI 10.1007/BF00128147; [86] Walton, D. N. (2008). Informal logic: a pragmatic approach . New York: Cambridge University Press.; [87] Walton, D. N., Reed, C., and Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes . New York: Cambridge University Press.; [88] Walton, D., Macagno, F. (2016). A classification system for argumentation schemes . Argument & Computation, 6(3), 219–245. %7C DOI 10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772; [89] Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning (Vol. 7). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.; [90] Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the Classroom . Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. %7C DOI 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3; [91] Wilkinson, I. A. G., Murphy, P. K., & Binici, S. (2015). Dialogue-intensive pedagogies for promoting reading comprehension: What we know, what we need to know . In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 37–50). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.; [92] Wood, D., Wood, H., & Middleton, D. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-toface teaching strategies . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1, 131–147. %7C DOI 10.1177/016502547800100203; [93] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods . Los Angeles, CA: Sage.; [94] Zohar, A., & David, A. Ben. (2008). //Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 59–82. %7C doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4 %7C DOI 10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4; [95] Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.10008; 1803-7437 (print); 2336-4521 (online); http://hdl.handle.net/handle/11222.digilib/142244; 10; serial/1_StudiaPaedagogica/24-2019-4/#10
-
13
المصدر: Studia Paedagogica. 22(4):55-76
مصطلحات موضوعية: matematiikka, dialogic argumentation, mathematics and science education, ammatillinen kehitys, dialogisuus, argumentointi, ta516, tiedekasvatus, professional development
-
14
المؤلفون: Lehesvuori, Sami, Hähkiöniemi, Markus, Jokiranta, Kaisa, Nieminen, Pasi, Hiltunen, Jenna, Viiri, Jouni
مصطلحات موضوعية: dialogic argumentation, professional development, mathematics and science education
Relation: Studia paedagogica; [1] Abell, S. K. (Ed.). (2000). Science teacher education: An international perspective . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.; [2] Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and responding to students' questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174–193.; [3] Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching (3rd ed.). York: Dialogos.; [4] Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays . Austin: University of Texas Press.; [5] Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: Introduction and review . ZDM, 47(7), 1047–1065. %7C DOI 10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8; [6] Berland, L. (2011). Explaining variations in how classroom communities adapt the practice of scientific argumentation . Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 625–664. %7C DOI 10.1080/10508406.2011.591718; [7] Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts . Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. %7C DOI 10.1002/sce.20402; [8] Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development . Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012; [9] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–81. %7C DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa; [10] Carneiro, R. (2007). The big picture: Understanding learning and meta-learning challenges . European Journal of Education, 42(2), 151–172. %7C DOI 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00303.x; [11] Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.20171; [12] Chval, K., Abell, S., Pareja, E., Musikul, K., & Ritzka, G. (2008). Science and mathematics teachers' experiences, needs, and expectations regarding professional development . Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 31–43. %7C DOI 10.12973/ejmste/75304; [13] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.; [14] Conner, A. M., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students' engagement in mathematical activities . Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. %7C DOI 10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8; [15] Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures . Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. %7C DOI 10.3102/0013189X08331140; [16] Essien, A. A. (2017). Dialogic and argumentation structures in one quadratic inequalities lesson . In J. Adler & A. Sfard (Eds.), Research for educational change: Transforming researchers' insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 82–99). London: Routledge.; [17] Helleve, I. (2009). Theoretical foundations of teachers' professional development . In J. O. Lindberg & A. Olofsson (Eds.), Online learning communities and teacher professional development: Methods for improved education delivery (pp. 1–19). Hershey: IGI Global Information Science Reference.; [18] Kiemer, K., Gröshner, A., Pehmer, A.-K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science . Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003; [19] Lehesvuori, S. (2013). Towards dialogic teaching in science: Challenging classroom realities through teacher education . Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.; [20] Lehesvuori, S., Ramnarain, U., & Viiri, J. (2017). Challenging transmission modes of teaching in science classrooms: Enhancing learner-centredness through dialogicity . Research in Science Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9598-7 %7C DOI 10.1007/s11165-016-9598-7; [21] Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2011). Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers . Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(8), 705–727. %7C DOI 10.1007/s10972-011-9253-0; [22] Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Moate, J., & Helaakoski, J. (2013). Visualizing communication structures in science classrooms: Tracing cumulativity in teacher-led whole class discussions . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 912–939. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.21100; [23] Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values . Norwood: Ablex Publishing Company.; [24] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry . Newbury Park: Sage Publications.; [25] Loughran, J. J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.20007; [26] Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, A. (2001). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment . Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–3), 87–125. %7C DOI 10.1023/A:1012785106627; [27] McNeill, K. L., Pimentel, D. S., & Strauss, E. G. (2013). The impact of high school science teachers' beliefs, curricular enactments, and experience on student learning during an inquiry-based urban ecology curriculum . International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2608–2644. %7C DOI 10.1080/09500693.2011.618193; [28] Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together . London: Routledge.; [29] Mercer, N. (2009). Developing argumentation: Lessons learned in the primary school . In N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 177–194). Berlin: Springer.; [30] Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom . Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. %7C DOI 10.1080/09500780902954273; [31] Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life . Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. %7C DOI 10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1; [32] Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in science classrooms . Milton Keynes: Open University Press.; [33] O'Brien, J. (1993). Action research through stimulated recall . Research in Science Education, 23(1), 214–221. %7C DOI 10.1007/BF02357063; [34] Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.20035; [35] Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (2010). How (well structured) talk builds the mind . In R. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), From genes to context: New discoveries about learning from educational research and their applications (pp. 163–194). New York: Springer.; [36] Roth, W.-M. (2014). Science language Wanted Alive: Through the dialectical/dialogical lens of Vygotsky and the Bakhtin circle . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 1049–1083. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.21158; [37] Scott, P., & Ametller, J. (2007). Teaching science in a meaningful way: Striking a balance between 'opening up' and 'closing down' classroom talk . School Science Review, 88(324), 77–83.; [38] Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk . Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14–25. %7C DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005; [39] Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom . International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. %7C DOI 10.1080/09500690500336957; [40] Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics . Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.; [41] Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; [42] van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research . Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160. %7C DOI 10.1080/03057267.2012.738020; [43] Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies . Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. %7C DOI 10.1080/00220272.2012.668938; [44] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes . M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.; [45] Watters, J. J. (2016). Engaging elementary students in learning science: An analysis of classroom dialogue . Instructional Science, 44(1), 25–44. %7C DOI 10.1007/s11251-015-9364-7; [46] Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; [47] Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making . Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305. %7C DOI 10.1177/002248719104200407; [48] Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. %7C DOI 10.1002/tea.10008; 1803-7437 (print); 2336-4521 (online); http://hdl.handle.net/handle/11222.digilib/137669; serial/1_StudiaPaedagogica/22-2017-4/#6
-
15
المؤلفون: Jenna Hiltunen, Sami Lehesvuori, Markus Hähkiöniemi, Kaisa Jokiranta, Pasi Nieminen, Jouni Viiri
مصطلحات موضوعية: 060201 languages & linguistics, Dialogic, Secondary education, dialogic argumentation, matematiikka, 05 social sciences, Professional development, 050301 education, 06 humanities and the arts, Teacher education, Education, Argumentation theory, mathematics and science education, ammatillinen kehitys, dialogisuus, 0602 languages and literature, Mathematics education, argumentointi, Educational science, tiedekasvatus, 0503 education
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
16Academic Journal
المؤلفون: FERRARI, FEDERICA
المساهمون: Ferrari F.
مصطلحات موضوعية: EMOTION, RATIONALITY, DIALOGUE, DIALOGIC ARGUMENTATION, CO-OPERATIVE PRICIPLE
وصف الملف: STAMPA
Relation: volume:XIV; firstpage:647; lastpage:659; numberofpages:13; journal:L'ANALISI LINGUISTICA E LETTERARIA; http://hdl.handle.net/11585/111731
الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/111731
-
17
المؤلفون: Louka, Panayiotis
المساهمون: Βαλανίδης, Νίκος, Valanides, Nicos, Χρίστου, Κωνσταντίνος, Αγγελή-Βαλανίδη, Χαρούλα, Ιωαννίδης, Γιώργος, Μαρκουλής, Διομήδης, Christou, Constantinos, Angeli-Valanide, Charoula, Ioannides, George, Markoulis, Diomides, University of Cyprus, Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, Department of Education, Πανεπιστήμιο Κύπρου, Σχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής, Τμήμα Επιστημών της Αγωγής
مصطلحات موضوعية: ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΑ ΘΕΜΑΤΑ, DIALOGIC ARGUMENTATION, ΣΥΝΘΗΚΕΣ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ, Reasoning, INDIVIDUAL ARGUMENTATION, Reason, ΑΤΟΜΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, ARGUMENTATION CONTEXTS, SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION, SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES, ΔΙΑΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS, ΑΤΟΜΙΚΑ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΣΤΙΚΑ, Critical thinking
وصف الملف: ix, 254 σ. : εικ.; 30 εκ.
-
18
المساهمون: Βαλανίδης, Νίκος, Χρίστου, Κωνσταντίνος, Αγγελή-Βαλανίδη, Χαρούλα, Ιωαννίδης, Γιώργος, Μαρκουλής, Διομήδης, Christou, Constantinos, Angeli-Valanide, Charoula, Ioannides, George, Markoulis, Diomides, Valanides, Nicos, Πανεπιστήμιο Κύπρου, Σχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής, Τμήμα Επιστημών της Αγωγής, University of Cyprus, Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, Department of Education
مصطلحات موضوعية: ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΑ ΘΕΜΑΤΑ, DIALOGIC ARGUMENTATION, ΣΥΝΘΗΚΕΣ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ, Reasoning, INDIVIDUAL ARGUMENTATION, Reason, ΑΤΟΜΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, ARGUMENTATION CONTEXTS, SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION, SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES, ΔΙΑΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS, ΑΤΟΜΙΚΑ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΣΤΙΚΑ, Critical thinking
وصف الملف: ix, 254 σ. : εικ.; 30 εκ.
-
19
المؤلفون: FERRARI, FEDERICA
المساهمون: Ferrari F.
المصدر: L'Analisi linguistica e letteraria, Pp 647-659 (2009)
مصطلحات موضوعية: lcsh:Language and Literature, RATIONALITY, DIALOGIC ARGUMENTATION, EMOTION, DIALOGUE, CO-OPERATIVE PRICIPLE, lcsh:P
وصف الملف: STAMPA
-
20Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: Λουκά, Παναγιώτης, Louka, Panayiotis
المساهمون: Βαλανίδης, Νίκος, Valanides, Nicos, Χρίστου, Κωνσταντίνος, Αγγελή-Βαλανίδη, Χαρούλα, Ιωαννίδης, Γιώργος, Μαρκουλής, Διομήδης, Christou, Constantinos, Angeli-Valanide, Charoula, Ioannides, George, Markoulis, Diomides, University of Cyprus, Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, Department of Education, Πανεπιστήμιο Κύπρου, Σχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής, Τμήμα Επιστημών της Αγωγής
مصطلحات موضوعية: Reasoning, Critical thinking, Reason, ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, ΑΤΟΜΙΚΑ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΣΤΙΚΑ, ΣΥΝΘΗΚΕΣ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ, ΑΤΟΜΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, ΔΙΑΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΑ, ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΑ ΘΕΜΑΤΑ, INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS, ARGUMENTATION CONTEXTS, INDIVIDUAL ARGUMENTATION, DIALOGIC ARGUMENTATION, SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES, SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION
وصف الملف: ix, 254 σ. : εικ.; 30 εκ.
Relation: BC177.L69 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10797/5758
الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/10797/5758